35
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
35 points (97.3% liked)
science
22687 readers
14 users here now
A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.
rule #1: be kind
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Just to be clear, this is about supplements. It’s doesn’t say anything about differences in dietary protein.
The actual title:
And supplements are largely unnecessary, so this study says absolutely bupkis.
Right, for the average person, protein supplements are unnecessary as long as they are healthy and eat well.
Athletes (and people with body dysmorphia 😬) might struggle to get enough protein in their diet. But, far too many people think they’re in a position that would warrant supplements when just a little attention to diet is sufficient.
beef cake. beef cake.
There are many other reasons to take protein supplements. High protein foods can be expensive (protein can be too but there are many options). It's also a quick add to a meal vs prepping an entire meal.
You don't need to be an athlete to workout 5 days a week and if you want to visually see some of the results protein supplements help. It can also help with recovery whether you're strength, training or training your body in any other way. You don't have to be an athlete to want to be physically fit. Protein can help.
What relevance does that have? Plenty of studies in the past have already demonstrated dietary plant protein is just as good for you as animal protein.
Huh? It’s what the research is about.
Because meat lovers.
Well, exposing the click bait in the title and providing context about the actual study involved is relevant because ...it exposes the click bait in the title and provides context about the actual study involved.
This is not relevant to the context of the article, and like the vegan at a party, it's good information but not part of the discussion about protein supplements during strength training except as an adjacent fact about diet and not about strength training directly nor supplements.
Edited the title to clarify
What was the original title, just to make some of the comments make sense? I can't seem to find a way to lookup the history
I don't understand the distinction you're making.
Unless the study controlled for the subjects' regular diet and non supplement protein, its conclusions don't mean much.
For example, if I get 100+g of protein on a typical day then, a 19g protein bar is a nice addition, but it's in the minority compared to the rest of my protein sources.