Update: anarchist.nexus has been refederated (lemmy.world)

submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by lwadmin@lemmy.world to c/lemmyworld@lemmy.world

375 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Due to a (now former) admin of the instance anarchist.nexus calling for a member of our team, as well as anyone else they call a zionist, to be murdered, the instance has been defederated.

We're currently discussing how we will proceed with this situation and whether it will affect lemmy.dbzer0.com, which is mostly run by the same admin team, notably excluding the person who used to be on the anarchist.nexus admin team.

We will share further updates once we have them.

Update 2026-04-22 23:25 UTC: anarchist.nexus federation has been reactivated.

We are still discussing this matter, but there is currently no point in keeping anarchist.nexus defederated while lemmy.dbzer0.com is federated.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

wow, this screed doesn't at all debunk the accusation of overt pro-zionist moderation

edit:

jill stein is anti Zionist, too

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dropped that whole "political" thing like a rock, didn't you? You never said anything about "pro-Zionist moderation"; your only two comments that I replied to were whinging about "politically based" and "political motivations", and now you're pivoting with no acknowledgement, because you're fundamentally arguing in bad faith.

If your problem is their specific politics, you can be upfront about that, but you deliberately chose not to, and you've proven discussion with you is not worth anyone's time because of it.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

zionism is obviously a political position, and the mods have feigned impartiality about it while moderating anti Zionist sentiment away. you are splitting hairs and it's unbecoming. your shitty attitude is also damaging your case here.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

your shitty attitude is also damaging your case here.

Tone policing too – as though I need my argument to be compelling to somebody who intentionally layers their argument under conservative-style misdirection, and pretending as though failing to mince words to your liking hurts the credibility of my argument.

Edit: Policing my tone out one side of your mouth while remarking "[the admins aren't] going to suck you off" out the other is so pathetically expected.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

conservative-style misdirection

pigeonholing also doesn't help your case

edit:

giving it back isn't hypocrisy. it's playing by the rules.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -3 points 1 month ago

pigeonholing

Oh, are we back to projection again?

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

a little tu quo isn't beneath either of us.

[-] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago

Well actually, I spoke too soon; I didn't realize you never stopped projecting when you were policing my tone out one side of your mouth while remarking "[the admins aren't] going to suck you off" out the other. You're just comically, pathetically dishonest in everything you've said in this thread.

[-] VictoriaAScharleau@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

I didn’t realize you never stopped projecting when you were policing my tone out one side of your mouth while remarking “[the admins aren’t] going to suck you off”

what have I ever said in supplication to the admins? this is, actually, pure projection