110

Voyager 1 is still transmitting from beyond the heliosphere on 22 watts — less power than the bulb in your hallway — and the engineers who built it in the 1970s never expected we'd still be listening (spacedaily.com)

submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by inari@piefed.zip to c/space@beehaw.org

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] inari@piefed.zip 18 points 2 weeks ago

NASA has a neat little video showing the path taken by Voyager 1: https://svs.gsfc.nasa.gov/4139

[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Very interesting. So they both manouvred (slingshot) using planets' gravity wells? Not everything in SciFi is fiction I guess.

And V1 has traveled further from our solar system than the solar system's diameter. Wow.

Extremely high bitrate on the video due to starry background, btw. My old lappy got wheezy.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 9 points 2 weeks ago

Yes, and there was a 175 year window for the planets to be lined up like that.

[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 2 weeks ago

You mean the planets just sat there for 175 years? Wow, I really learned something new today.

[-] Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz 10 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Windows to use all the gas giants for gravity slingshots in quick succession only occur every 175 years. Is that better?

[-] snooggums@piefed.world 4 points 2 weeks ago

Yes

[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

In the scientific fiction genre, everything is scientifically possible. That's the entire premise. Time tells us what they get right and what becomes fantasy.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 weeks ago

Nothing in Star Wars is scientifically possible or ever will be.

[-] RicoBerto@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 weeks ago

Star wars is barely science fiction. It's basically fantasy with a bit of tech.

[-] Steve@communick.news 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

It's absolutely fantasy. No debate. So is Star Trek.

Actual science fiction is like the recent Hail Mary. Everything is based on literal real science, with maybe one "what if" kind of stretch.

[-] RicoBerto@piefed.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 weeks ago

I don't know that i'd go that far. There is certainly debate on what constutes hard or soft sci-fi, but I'd say as long as the technology is either the focus, or is the main facilitator of the story then it's more sci-fi. In star wars there is not much technology that is necessarily required, all of it could have been replaced with fantasy elements and it's the same. It's not a focus, whereas the expanse for instance relies upon the limitations of the technology to drive the plot.

I don't know could be talking out my ass, purely vibes based genre definition.