807
Starfield players pirate the DLSS mod after the developer locks it behind paywall
(www.gamescensor.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2023
807 points (97.3% liked)
Games
32724 readers
854 users here now
Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.
Weekly Threads:
Rules:
-
Submissions have to be related to games
-
No bigotry or harassment, be civil
-
No excessive self-promotion
-
Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts
-
Mark Spoilers and NSFW
-
No linking to piracy
More information about the community rules can be found here.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Man, and I was just about to get that mod too. Really scummy.
No, it's always been behind a paywall. There's one by a different modder that isn't: https://www.nexusmods.com/starfield/mods/761
How has anyone's experience been with this? I haven't installed it yet.
Tried it last night. At first it wouldn't start and had to change a digit from 0 to 1 or vice versa in the .ini, but worked fine after that.
Nice!
Is it? Didn't someone put effort into this?
For sure, but like most every other mod for any game out there, there's donation pages and Patreons. What if you buy it and download it, and it turns out it doesn't work for you? You can't refund it like you would a Steam game. Locking mods, an already experimental thing, behind a paywall is scummy, because you're not only profiting off of someone else's game, you're also taking money from people who aren't even sure it's right for them. There are tons of mods out there that are not paywalled and are comfortably financially supported through Patreon. Using a paywall in this situation is just a cash grab banking on a freshly released game. Literally the day after.
Can you link to a few game modders who don't paywall but get enough in donations to make a living?
The difference is the legal boundary. Microsoft allows you legally to write your own code and sell it to people to run on their computers without owning Microsoft as a company. Bethesda owns their software, and has legal agreements you agree to when you skip through them when you start up the game, saying you won't mod it or profit off their game. Look at my other comment if you want to actually see where.
"you wonโt mod it" this, as you know, is something people have done for decades and ignored.
Once again, you didn't read my comment lmao. You're right. They do ignore it, but they don't ignore it when money is involved. Literally look up cases where companies shut down mods, they usually are financially driven.
Since you're not here to actually have a discussion in good faith, I'm going to go. Take care ๐
I read all your comments. Classic way to leave when someone doesn't agree with you. Ta ta.
Yeah, I was going to give the example of a GPU - something you might buy to play this game. But pretty much everything that goes into the setup and desk that lets you play the video game kinda counts.
So don't get it? There are other mods and whatnot. Just sounds like you don't like how they've monetised their work, which is fine, but instead of moaning that you want people to work for free, just don't buy it?
Way to strawman me and ignore my points ๐ I do not want people working for free. I am firmly pro-union and pro-fair pay and all of that. They don't have to work for free. They can monetize it the way every other mod does it by having a Patreon that you can subscribe to or donate to support them. Plenty of mods do this already and this is the generally accepted way to do it due to the reasons I mentioned before, which I will now spell out for you because you ignored them:
Because they didn't monetise it the way you want, doesn't mean it's not okay.
Ignoring all of my comment again. Classic. See ya.
No, I'm just not looking for an essay, I'm responding to what I am interested in.
Way to invalid that person's feelings.
No.