83
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by corgiwithalaptop@hexbear.net to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net

@KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com

You're not banned here*, get in and explain why Yandere Simulator isn't pedophilic. Don't DM me like a coward.

*yet

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Again, link my pedo apologizing. How the hell am I supposed to “defend myself” when the accusation doesn’t even point to something to defend.

All I did in that thread was *checks notes* describe what the word Yandre meant.

[-] TomboyShulk@hexbear.net 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I’m gonna give you all at least one hour to pile onto this persnickety rapscallion, folks. Maybe less, but I’m feeling generous tonight—I’m feeling generous. Don’t say I don’t give you nice things! a-little-trolling

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Have fun I guess.

I never even talked about the game beyond “I’ve never heard of it before” and “the description someone else posted sounds terrible, but not sexual.”

If that’s enough to be branded a pedo apologizer here, not sure I give much of a fuck about the ban anymore.

[-] TomboyShulk@hexbear.net 31 points 1 year ago

I simply would not reflexively defend the game I know absolutely nothing about nia-peace

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

What does the word “defend” mean to you?

[-] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago

Yandre isn’t inherently sexual. It’s more like “crazy stalker” or “crazy because of love/infatuation.”

Think of the “crazy stalker girl” trope.

Could it be sexual? Yes. Just like fishnets or knee high socks can be sexual.

Is it sexual in this case? No idea, this is the first I’ve heard of this game.

I have no idea what Im talking about anyway here's the definition of ~~ephebophilia~~ yandere

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

And where in there did I defend the game, the author, or pedophiles?

[-] thirtymilliondeadfish@hexbear.net 21 points 1 year ago

crazy stalker girl trope is entirely separate from sexual harassment discourse what are you talking about

also I have no idea what I'm talking about it's not sexual blob-no-thoughts

[-] TomboyShulk@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I would say defending to me encompasses doubling down on a game you’ve never heard of until now being non-sexual because you feel compelled to repackage a stalker fetish as non-fetishistic edgeworth-shrug

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

My friend, I literally said I had no idea if it was sexual in context of the game.

[-] TomboyShulk@hexbear.net 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Then… just say that, take the L, acknowledge you can’t speak for it and move on, instead of continuing to fervently hold the line past that madeline-deadpan

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I literally did.

The funny thing to all of this is, I’m being attacked for something I didn’t do, because a mod decided to put me on blast.

Most of these commenters haven’t looked at my messages. Those that did, realize I wasn’t defending anything in my comments.

And as to why I didn’t move on? Maybe because I was called a pedo apologist, told I deserved to die, then blocked from further interaction.

[-] TomboyShulk@hexbear.net 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You are still holding the line at this moment madeline-deadpan

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago

The only line holding I’m doing, is arguing that I didn’t defend a pedo, or a pedo game, or a pedo dev.

You’re telling me you’d just lay down and accept the title “pedo apologist” in a public log?

I’ve already said many times over, I don’t know anything about this game beyond a description posted by someone else. And from that blurb, I said it sounded deranged.

[-] TomboyShulk@hexbear.net 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

waltuh here’s what you’re gonna do. you’re gonna go into the thread where you’re being called out and say “I didn’t know about the content of the game. I don’t mean to come across as such. I apologize for the misunderstanding, I don’t mean to defend the developer or the game or the content within it, I just wanted to infodump about the subject itself.” and then you’re gonna say the words “I don’t want to talk about this topic anymore, I don’t have anything more to say about it beyond what I’ve already said” to the people who egg you on about it, and then you’re gonna stand up from your computer and get some fresh air.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 1 year ago

In the interest of peace, alright.

But I feel the need to point out one final time… I explicitly said I knew nothing about the game to make clear that I wasn’t talking on the game.

Beyond that: I don’t want to talk about this topic anymore, I don’t have anything more to say about it.

[-] DoiDoi@hexbear.net 18 points 1 year ago

Large group of people here insisting that the only way to read your comments is in defense of the pedo torture game.

You are the only person who asserts anything different.

Maybe you could wiggle out of this by saying you'll commit to clearer writing in the future. It wouldn't be honest, but it would give you an out.

[-] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago

Honestly, not sure how I could make it more clear.

I said I knew nothing about the game, which means I know nothing about the author.

I said (admittedly in a different comment) that the game sounds deranged.

I never actually spoke on the game beyond those points.

How exactly could I be more clear?

[-] DoiDoi@hexbear.net 20 points 1 year ago

sometimes I wonder if people like you are actually emotionally capable of being wrong and learning from mistakes. You're doing everything you can to keep up some pointless arguments instead of understanding a single thing people are saying to you.

load more comments (30 replies)
load more comments (31 replies)
load more comments (54 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2023
83 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13545 readers
741 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS