965
submitted 9 months ago by naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] naturalgasbad@lemmy.ca 78 points 9 months ago

The US could've done the same, and yet...

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca 31 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

How? No way 75% of the states would agree.

An amendment may be proposed by a two-thirds vote of both Houses of Congress, or, if two-thirds of the States request one, by a convention called for that purpose. The amendment must then be ratified by three-fourths of the State legislatures, or three-fourths of conventions called in each State for ratification.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 4 points 8 months ago

When Dems had the supermajority during the first part of Obama’s term, Roe could have easily been codified into law. They slept on this at the time, saying there were “other priorities.”

So, while this doesn’t require a constitutional amendment to become the law of the land, with how incredibly dysfunctional Congress has become, it may be the case that Article V conventions are the only way to change the laws to suit the needs of the public over the desires of the elites.

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca -5 points 8 months ago

Ah! The mythical supermajority that never really was.

[-] crusa187@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 months ago

It quite literally was that until Kennedy died.

[-] clgoh@lemmy.ca -1 points 8 months ago

With Franken not sworn in for months, Byrd hospitalized and Kennedy's death they never had 60 sitting senators.

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (32 replies)
load more comments (45 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2024
965 points (98.2% liked)

World News

32378 readers
479 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS