689
rule (lemmy.cafe)
submitted 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) by spujb@lemmy.cafe to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

antibigotry noticethis post does not support or normalize misgendering nonbinary people. wakko generally seems to canonically accept he/him pronouns, but if that weren’t the case the behavior exhibited in this post would be unacceptable, harmful, and vehemently condemned, and would be showcased here only as an example of and condemnation against bigotry, and should not be understood as condoning.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 28 points 8 months ago

That joke is even better when you know the story behind it. What they would do is put extremely over the top jokes into the script for the censors to pounce on so that the slightly off color joke they wanted two pages later would seem tame by comparison.

That was one of those jokes and somehow it slipped by everybody.

[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 8 points 8 months ago

Ahhh, an early form of the Team America approach. Matt & Trey shot the most over-the-top nonsense they could think of so the MPAA busybodies would label it NC-17 and go 'but it'd be R if you removed the sex scene where the puppets shit on each other.'

It's comedy as ablative armor.

[-] grue@lemmy.world 2 points 8 months ago

What was the tame-by-comparison joke it was paired with?

[-] EdibleFriend@lemmy.world 3 points 8 months ago

Honestly I can't remember. I just remember reading, many many moons ago, a writer talking about that.

this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
689 points (100.0% liked)

196

16601 readers
1699 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS