214
submitted 7 months ago by Alsephina@lemmy.ml to c/worldnews@lemmy.ml

Iranian military chief says overnight attack ‘achieved all its goals’, adding that US bases are under threat if it backs Israeli retaliation.

Iran has warned Israel of a larger attack on its territory should it retaliate against Tehran’s overnight drone and missile attacks, adding that the United States should not back an Israeli military action.

“If the Zionist regime [Israel] or its supporters demonstrate reckless behaviour, they will receive a decisive and much stronger response,” Iran’s President Ebrahim Raisi said in a statement on Sunday. ⠀

However, in a signal that Iran’s response was calculated in an attempt to avoid any major escalation, the Iranian foreign minister Amir Abdollahian said that Tehran had informed the US of the planned attack 72 hours in advance, and said that the strikes would be “limited” and for self-defence.

That did not stop more aggressive language from other officials, with the commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), Hossein Salami, warning that Tehran would retaliate against any Israeli attacks on its interests, officials or citizens.

“From now on, whenever Israel attacks Iranian interests… we will attack from Iran.” ⠀

“The matter can be deemed concluded. However, should the Israeli regime make another mistake, Iran’s response will be considerably more severe,” said a statement.

It added that the US should “stay away” from the conflict, as it is an issue between Iran and Israel.

Archive link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] mindlight@lemm.ee -1 points 7 months ago

If WWIII is knocking on the door it started with Russia trying to invade Ukraine.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 7 months ago

It tried? I'm fairly certain it did.

[-] mindlight@lemm.ee -4 points 7 months ago

It depends on what you define as the endgame.

If Kiev is the end game, then Russia haven't succeeded. If Kiev isn't the endgame, the Russian 64km long column on its way to Kiev just becomes more than the pathetic failure of Russian military strategy it was at the time.

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 7 months ago

Capturing Kiev requires invading Ukraine first. Russia has invaded Ukraine. It has demonstrated absolutely zero intent so far to march troops into Kiev.

[-] mindlight@lemm.ee -4 points 7 months ago

A 64km long column moving towards Kiev is pretty much "marching troops into Kiev".

[-] freagle@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Serious question, have you been able to find ANY Western reporting about any Russian feints during the first week of the invasion? I haven't been able to. Which is strange, because we have West Point saying that during some counter-offensives there were Russian feints, appearing to earnestly be asking the question of whether deception is still a major part of war. If you read the Wikipedia article about that 64km convoy, it's pretty much relying entirely on Western reporting, and the reports are pretty silly. Soldiers captured from that convoy only had 3 days of rations? Does that sound like a viable approach to capturing and holding a capital city? I don't think so. Just read that article and the sources critically - it doesn't look like a serious maneuver. It looks a lot like a feint.

So if Russia is known to use feints, but NONE of the initial maneuvers were reported as feints, then we are left with either A) Russia launched zero feints, or B) we haven't labeled which maneuvers were feints. That convoy looks A LOT like a feint to me. And how would a successful feint be reported by Western propaganda rags? As a victory for the West for having defeated such a great maneuver that also demonstrates the silliness of the opponent. That opponent, by the way, has destroyed Ukraine and there is no chance of Ukrainian victory at this point. So, do we trust the analysis that the convoy was an earnest maneuver, or do we see the evidence and think "perhaps this was a feint"?

[-] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah well considering how Russia and Iran are buddy buddy, that makes sense. But I would say Russia vs Ukraine is the oil, and Israel was the spark as soon as they deliberately hit the Iranian embassy in Syria.

this post was submitted on 14 Apr 2024
214 points (98.2% liked)

World News

32381 readers
619 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS