251
submitted 7 months ago by return2ozma@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] RaoulDook@lemmy.world 46 points 7 months ago

I'm not a ban fan but social media like that is psychological cancer that is definitely harming the young and old mentally.

Kids growing up these days have the burden of the disgusting need for social media self-promotion. They are conditioned that attention and Likes are the most valuable social currency, and waste so much of their valuable youth pursuing that hollow bullshit.

I'm keeping my kids off social media for as long as I can so they can experience growing up without Cloud-automated peer pressure.

[-] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 7 months ago

They said this about TV. And game consoles. And computers. And every social media website. They said this about movies when they first came out too.

Social media is a reality of the world. This ban isn't getting rid of that, just banning one specific platform. Why is Intagram Reels acceptable but Tik Tok isn't? Because ones is owned by a Chinese company and the other isn't. That's all this ban is about. Literally nothing else.

[-] desconectado@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Yeah, I'm almost 100% sure the "tiktok is damaging kid's brains" is the millennial equivalent of boomers "videogames and TV are damaging kid's brains".

I'm a millennia by the way, and we are starting to sound a bit afraid of technologies.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago

Short form video is genuinely pretty bad though... Most social media is too, it's not just a new medium people are scared of, it deliberately trains people to maximize use of it

Facebook pioneered most of the (unethical) experiments that make it so bad. They experimented with what makes people use the app for longest - controversial topics, quickly decreasing the amount of "desired" content as you scroll to push you to the optimal reinforcement schedule in operant conditioning, and copious amounts of alerts to give you fomo

Video games can be bad for the same reason - they can also be built to cultivate addiction. And social media can be built without it... The difference between Reddit pre-investment (which coincidentally, I think was also related to tencent/bytedance... They have an obscene amount of money invested everywhere) and Reddit now is a good example

It's not just people clutching pearls about the new thing or a rise in mental illness coinciding with the growth of social media - there's a science-backed arms race between engineering more time in app and understanding/treating the effects

(That being said, I agree we millennials are starting to emotionally reject new technology - in this case there's just solid science showing how this is being misused with bad effects)

[-] desconectado@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Check out the new video by "some more news", it's more comedy than anything, by it deals with some reputable sources.

https://youtu.be/5aFQY6-Mxcw?si=IFkuuPCQ6Pmv7YOK

The effect is not clear cut, and there are many other confounding effects that might be more important, and being glued to your phone might be a symptom more than a cause, but I agree that excessive social media and short format videos are bad for you, but that can be said about video games or even regular games.

[-] theneverfox@pawb.social 1 points 7 months ago

Like you said, that guy is more comedy than anything. I really can't stand his videos... While I agree with most of the positions I've seen him take, there's a clear bias (maybe in the name of humor... He seems like he's going for a Jon Steward/John Oliver thing, but I just don't find him funny)

Most of all, he seems like he's got researchers pumping out scripts at a furious pace

I don't think that's a great source for this, the guy isn't a science communicator - social issues and current events sure. This is a hot pop science issue turned cultural - you really want to hear from experts on this kind of topic, it's such a muddied issue. They've been writing articles about how "social media is destroying the children" and "social media isn't as bad as it seems" for a decade and a half.

I agree there's a lot of confounding factors. Smart phones exploded along with social media after all, that alone was transformative

But that's if you look at it all together, I'm not claiming that social media is the source of all our problems (I'd argue there's a good case, but one near impossible to prove)

I'm saying social media is bad for you, particularly short form video. And by that, what I mean specifically is that it's highly addictive, incentivices the spread of misinfo, and is a displacement activity (eats up any amount of time) that doesn't improve mood or life satisfaction. And unlike the previous new forms of media, it was designed to be addictive by big data crunching - sensationalism isn't new, but this was too fast and too centralized for the natural push and pull to happen

I can go into each of those aspects deeper, but I don't think anyone is arguing this is a better way to socialize or a net good for mental health

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2024
251 points (96.0% liked)

News

23424 readers
1525 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS