734

Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)

submitted 6 months ago by Persona3Reload@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone

75 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] Gork@lemm.ee 235 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Google's AI generated overviews seem like a huge disaster lol.

[-] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 6 months ago

First the Google Bard demo, then the racial bias and pedophile sympathy of Gemini, now this.

It's funny that they keep floundering with AI considering they invented the transformer architecture that kickstarted this whole AI gold rush.

[-] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 months ago

What pedophile sympathy?

[-] Wirlocke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 6 months ago

Here is an article about it. Even if it's technically right in some ways, the language it uses tries to normalize pedophilia in the same ways as sexualities. Specifically the term "Minor Attracted Person" is controversial and tries to make pedophilia into an Identity like "Person of Color".

It was lampshading the fact this is a highly dangerous disorder. It shouldn't be blindly accepted but instead require immediate psychiatric care at best.

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2024/feb/28/googles-gemini-chatbot-soft-on-pedophilia-individu/

[-] jbk@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 6 months ago

I think you're misunderstanding. This is NOT normalizing it at all. This is giving you an actual answer/explanation to why those people think and act like they do.

Normalizing would be saying something such as "it's okay or just accept it" but that's not what's going on here.

https://twitter.com/BennoLenno/status/1761084247182360871

It should also then mention how wrong it is to have those feelings and that those people have some sort of mental health issue and need to be evaluated.