15
Play HDR movie on Linux
(lemm.ee)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 May 2024
15 points (100.0% liked)
Linux Questions
1074 readers
11 users here now
Linux questions Rules (in addition of the Lemmy.zip rules)
- stay on topic
- be nice (no name calling)
- do not post long blocks of text such as logs
- do not delete your posts
- only post questions (no information posts)
Tips for giving and receiving help
- be as clear and specific
- say thank you if a solution works
- verify your solutions before posting them as facts.
Any rule violations will result in disciplinary actions
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
I tried manjaro Linux on a live USB and it didn't work. I specifically used manjaro because it's an easy way to get Nvidia drivers on a live system, yes I know it has issues. I doubt Arch would be any better in terms of HDR support.
How would you do this? I don't think that's actually possible but if you know a way lmk.
Arch does have support for HDR, the how-to is linked by someone else on this post.
I heard that Manjaro has greatly diverged from Arch over the last couple of years. Someone said EOS, which I think stands for Evolution Operating System is closer to Arch now, but I haven't actually looked into it so idk how accurate that is. Arch takes more work to get set up than Pop does though, just FYI if you're considering it. It doesn't come with anything by default, unless you use a script to install.
Sorry, I don't actually know how to do it. I was wondering if you can use the instructions on that page but change the package name to the latest package name. That would definitely install it, but I don't think it will work. Based on what I read after commenting, Ubuntu LTS doesn't have the required dependencies, and Pop is based on Ubuntu LTS. It should be available in the next version though.
You're talking to someone who used to be an Arch user. It's nothing actually specific to arch, it's an initiative by KDE. People link to arch wiki because the wiki is a good source, and also because arch has more up to date packages than pretty much everything else.
Is it actually a different package name? That's not how these types of things normally work. Either the new version is in the repos or it isn't. The package name doesn't container the version number either, it's just kde-standard. I believe KDE 6 isn't in the standard Ubuntu repos at all, even for 24.04, which is newer than the one Pop OS is based on. It seems you have to use KDE Neon to get 6 on an Ubuntu based system.