76
submitted 4 months ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/linux@programming.dev
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] vividspecter@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

I suspect this is comparing against default Wine without fsync or esync (which are included with Proton and some wine builds) but from memory, ntsync has better compatibility and some performance gains over fsync (the next fastest alternative). But don't expect 50% performance gains compared to fsync in most workloads.

[-] Telorand@reddthat.com 5 points 4 months ago

Any bit of improvement is good in my book, though I agree that the title is a bit misleading.

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 4 months ago

Its indeed on average 50%.. in some games.. Sometimes only 5% while in other cases even 150%.

[-] refalo@programming.dev 2 points 4 months ago

Yep, and most people are already using fsync anyways via proton/lutris/etc. so the gain is a bit misleading.

this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2024
76 points (94.2% liked)

Linux

5385 readers
263 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS