55
  • Any and all textual works can be decried as "lacking exigence", no matter their content.

  • Make vague references to "the canon". Do not explain what canon you're talking about.

  • Employ words like "ethic (singular)", "schema", "polity". It doesn't matter if you use them correctly, just use them.

  • Pick a noun or an adjective to use as a verb. Just give it your own definition and let the audience figure it out.

  • Use obtuse definitions of philosophical frameworks, like "it's about bodies moving through space". Do not elaborate or make it easier to tell what the fuck that's supposed to mean.

  • If someone is making a good argument that you don't like, say it's "reinforcing teleological norms" and refuse to engage with it any more.

  • And, of course, the classic: Anything you don't like is "deeply unserious".

~~thank u for coming to my ted talk~~

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net 19 points 4 months ago

Hey I'm pretty sure you're not allowed to roast me like this unprompted.

i-spil-my-jice mods mods mods!

Wait, shit, I am the mods.

[-] RION@hexbear.net 16 points 4 months ago

akshually it's 70% a self-report and 30% things my college profs said that annoyed me

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13545 readers
741 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS