55
  • Any and all textual works can be decried as "lacking exigence", no matter their content.

  • Make vague references to "the canon". Do not explain what canon you're talking about.

  • Employ words like "ethic (singular)", "schema", "polity". It doesn't matter if you use them correctly, just use them.

  • Pick a noun or an adjective to use as a verb. Just give it your own definition and let the audience figure it out.

  • Use obtuse definitions of philosophical frameworks, like "it's about bodies moving through space". Do not elaborate or make it easier to tell what the fuck that's supposed to mean.

  • If someone is making a good argument that you don't like, say it's "reinforcing teleological norms" and refuse to engage with it any more.

  • And, of course, the classic: Anything you don't like is "deeply unserious".

~~thank u for coming to my ted talk~~

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] PM_ME_YOUR_FOUCAULTS@hexbear.net 7 points 4 months ago

Heraclitus stated "No man ever steps in the same river twice, for it's not the same river and he's not the same man.", this phrase can be deployed for almost all topics.

Common misconception. Heraclitus actually said you can never suck off the same man twice.

this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2024
55 points (100.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13545 readers
745 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS