62

Very sleek stuff, but reading the analysis gives bad vibes - what is their deal? Trot stuff? Can someone give me a good workup (I'm lazy)?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Mardoniush@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

As long as they're not talking about how communist AES is WSWS has fairly good takes.

[-] DivineChaos100@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago
[-] Hexboare@hexbear.net 17 points 2 months ago

Confusingly takes on Epstein seem fine from the briefest of skims

[-] AcidSmiley@hexbear.net 18 points 2 months ago

CW: SAI don't find it surprising, it's a typical patriarchy enjoyer take to denounce the most egregious sex pests to protect the rest. Only the most unhinged incels will openly call for their right to assault people, but a lot of men are way too comfortable with the kind of culture that enabled Weinstein and Spacey because they - often correctly - have a hunch that they themselves did clearly boundary violating things to their dates in the past and are scared they'll get called out for that.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 01 Sep 2024
62 points (98.4% liked)

chapotraphouse

13558 readers
784 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Gossip posts go in c/gossip. Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from c/gossip

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS