16
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] remon@ani.social 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Animal bladders and other organs were used as portable water containers.

[-] DrFistington@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago
[-] Carrolade@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

I was just gonna say, a squash that I cut in half, hollow out and dry is pretty low-tech stuff. Could probably use a coconut if you were in a pinch... Lot of options.

[-] shittydwarf@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Where'd you get the coconut?

[-] 48954246@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Swallow based delivery service

[-] Neondragon25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

I dated a girl like that once.

[-] egrets@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

And skins, tanned, stitched, and treated with resin. Pottery is also an ancient skill.

[-] SirDankbud@lemmy.ca 12 points 1 month ago

You know the smell dirt makes when its wet? It's called petrichor and humans can smell it better than sharks smell blood in the water. It is detectable by the human nose at 0.4 parts per BILLION. This gave early humans a huge advantage in finding water when needed. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrichor

[-] Smeagol666@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I was trying to think of that word just a few days ago when I went outside and could smell that a storm was coming, then my ADHD kicked in an I forgot about it.

[-] Revan343@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 weeks ago

Literally called dirtblood, I love it

[-] Diddlydee@feddit.uk 1 points 1 month ago

There is an Indian perfume base called Mitti Attar which tries to replicate this smell. It's like damp moss at first scent, then develops into rain on hot sand. It is entrancing. Proper Mitti Attar sells for thousands and takes years to make.

[-] grte@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Get dunked on, sharks.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

You know how many things you can just find on the ground that are hollow and can hold water? Even without making shit like a waterskin, humans had ways of containing liquids to travel with.

But also: Yes. Human populations still tend to be mostly clustered around sources of drinking water. Though our ability to move water around does make it possible to live elsewhere than a natural source.

[-] Nibodhika@lemmy.world 9 points 4 weeks ago

The answer should be fairly obvious to anyone who's looked at an European map, there's a reason why the oldest cities are always around or near rivers. Also humans had bottle-like technologies since essentially forever, it's probably one of the first tools to be developed after "pointy stick".

[-] Zenith@lemm.ee 1 points 4 weeks ago

The “bell beaker” people and culture is a fun rabbit hole for anyone interested in ancient water carrying technologies

[-] seven_phone@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Everyone has sippy bottles now but when I was young in the late 70s we played out all day and did not drink for 7 hours at a time and no one died. Alright one person died but mainly not.

[-] czardestructo@lemmy.world 4 points 4 weeks ago

My wife won't leave the house without several water containers as it she is crossing the god damn Sahara. We live in the North East, its not even dry! I always ask her how she survied childhood without stupid fancy bottles that are marketed. Fortunately she is patient with my crap and loves me...

[-] Nefara@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Yes, humans used to live much closer to water sources. On a town level, if you didn't have a creek or river or water somewhere nearby you just didn't settle there. Available water was absolutely necessary for agriculture, domestic animals, cooking, washing, and of course drinking. On a personal level, you would go in the morning to a central well or water source and gather your water you would need for the day. Depending on the household needs it might be multiple trips with heavy, full vessels. You would put the water in to household water vessels, like a basin for cleaning or a ewer for washing or your cook pot. If you were thirsty at home, you would take a dipper (basically a ladle) and take some water from the household supply.

Where did you get the impression we didn't used to have water bottles? They weren't made of plastic or metal but humans have carried water with them for probably as long as we've used tools. You can carry water in drinking horns, in clay pots, wooden buckets, in dried out animal bladders or leather skeins, and there's literally a type of gourd called a "bottle gourd" which has been dried out and used as a personal water bottle for milennia across any region that can grow them. Don't underestimate human ingenuity, we didn't always have access to the same technology and materials but we have always been able to problem solve.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 4 points 4 weeks ago

Adding to this, some plants and fruits have high water content (watermelons and some cacti), so you could keep your body hydrated without drinking water. For hunter-gatherers, who could likely be on the move away from water sources, this knowledge was crucial.

More interestingly, baobabs, huge "fat" trees found throughout the African continent, can be used as water tanks

[-] K1nsey6@lemmy.world 6 points 4 weeks ago

TiL that I'm early human. 1970s baby, but early human

[-] Iunnrais@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago

I suspect they’d include “cups, glasses, canteens, water skins, etc” in the category of “water bottles”. :p

[-] PP_BOY_@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

For the most part, yes, at least on a large scale. Proximity to a water source was pretty much a requirement for developments for most of history.

On the smaller side of things, other commenters have already mentioned that we had ways to store water before bottles existed.

[-] ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 month ago

I know it's hard to believe, but in a majority of places on Earth, water is readily available.

[-] bleistift2@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 month ago

I think it’s more accurate to say that water is readily available in places where humans are likely to go. Because, you know, humans don’t tend to go where there is no water.

[-] abbadon420@lemm.ee 0 points 1 month ago
[-] FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website 2 points 1 month ago

Dehydration is but a secondary concern as you're being chased by a sabertooth tiger.

[-] hungryphrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 4 weeks ago

Pretty much yes. If you look at a map, you'll notice that most cities, especially old (like old old) ones are next to or near water sources. There are, of course, other reasons for this as well: building a settlement by water will also give you the opportunity to use boats, for transportation and shipping. Merchant cities tend to be by seas and oceans, because transporting cargo by ships is much more efficient than by land, especially before airplanes. Then there's fishing, crop irrigation, and just that humans like bodies of water.

But also, what do you exactly mean by water bottle? Because water transportation and storage vessels have been around for quite a while, and aqueducts have been built by various civilisations across history.

[-] ptz@dubvee.org 1 points 1 month ago

Historically, there were multiple methods to store and transport water. Waterskins date back to the 2nd century. Pottery dates back to 18,000 BC and was probably used to transport water. Buckets were also a pretty early invention.

[-] Poojabber@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago

We had water bottles way before plastic.... we used wood, mud, clay, stone, and animal parts to store water before recorded history...

[-] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago

Going backwards in time, they had metal and brass containers, before that they had wooden buckets and barrels, ceramic pots, carved out animal parts or fruit of plants.

Before farming, probably a good portion of the water early people subsisted on was from the food they ate. (Berries and fruit, fish, meat, etc.) Water might pool around rocky areas after rain, even if there was no stream nearby in a pinch.

[-] palordrolap@fedia.io 0 points 1 month ago

Yes. Throughout history, people have almost always built their settlements close to major bodies of (fresh) water. For example, you'd be hard-pressed to find a major city anywhere in the world that doesn't have at least a stream near where it was founded, if not a full-blown river that still runs through the middle of it.

[-] KittenBiscuits@lemm.ee -1 points 1 month ago

Las Vegas being the exception that kind of proves the rule.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 month ago

If you look at the top 10 cities, all of them have a river, except Mexico City. That’s the real outlier. Large cities require lots of water, and that city is a really weird exception.

[-] ICastFist@programming.dev 3 points 4 weeks ago

Tenochtitlan was a "floating city", with artificial islands created on top of Lake Texcoco. Mexico City was founded on top of the ruins of the old Aztec capital and the lake was mostly drained.

To overcome the problems of drinking water, the Aztecs built a system of dams to separate the salty waters of the lake from the rain water of the effluents.

[-] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

So, essentially they’ve been relying on rain water since day one.

[-] queermunist@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 month ago

You ever notice how every other animal manages to survive without water bottles? It was like that for most of human existence, before we figured out water skins and wooden cups and clay jugs.

[-] Dasus@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

Really?

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waterskin

Also, there was an ice age. Not everyone lives in scorching climates. Theres fresh water around me 247/365. As waterskins are somewhat recent probably, in terms of evolutionary history.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
16 points (80.8% liked)

No Stupid Questions

42341 readers
182 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS