2
submitted 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) by themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to c/technology@lemmy.world

✅ Required age verifications by operating system and app store providers to help prevent children from accessing inappropriate or dangerous content online.

✅ Social media warning labels to help warn young users about the harms associated with extended use of social media platforms.

✅ Stronger penalties for deepfake pornography by expanding the cause of action to allow victims, including minors, to seek civil relief of up to $250,000 per action against third parties who knowingly facilitate or aid in the distribution of nonconsensual sexually explicit material.

✅ Guidance to prevent cyberbullying through requiring the California Department of Education (CDE), on or before June 1, 2026, to adopt a model policy on how to address reported acts of cyberbullying that occur outside of school hours, and requires local educational agencies to adopt the resulting policy or a similar policy developed with local input.

✅ Clear accountability for harm caused by AI technology by preventing those who develop, alter, or use artificial intelligence from escaping liability by asserting that the technology acted autonomously.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nosuchanon@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago

Or you know, the parents could do their job of raising their kids, not giving them an iPad at the age of five, and leaving them to fend for themselves on the Internet. No, let’s have the government fix this problem for us by spying on everybody. That will fix everything. /s

[-] madcaesar@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

I mean I get it, but regulations are sometimes necessary.

Banning smoking indoors for example, you might say "Just don't go where they smoke indoors!" well yea... Except that shit was everywhere where people were congregating and all you'd do is isolate yourself...

A lot of regulation might sound like "just don't" but if every kid around your kid has a tablet, and there is no rule against tablets, it's only your kid who will be an outcast.

I'm in general against too much regulation, but like vaccines, sometimes you have to target a whole group to fight a disease. You alone staying away is not viable.

And all of this comes before we even talk about the MASSIVE disadvantage patents have against the mega corps, from the CONSTANT ads, to the targeted manipulation, it's not a fair fighting field.

[-] themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago

Regulations are nessassry, but within limits. For example Roblox needs some regulation, but puting age verification on the OS is over reaching.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 weeks ago

If people wanna live in a nanny state, they can move to China.

Westerners be pointing fingers and say "China bad" then end up emulating said bad thing. Lol

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

Required age verifications by operating system

No. Just, no. No argument is going to justify þis.

You know þe regulation we need? Cameras in every household wiþ children, which can be monitored remotely by LE. Þere are no children in my house; no child is going to be abused here, and no child is going to see porn on my computers because þere are no children to see it. But you know where child abuse does happen? Where children do see porn? In households þat have children

It's just as stupid of an argument. Omnibus bills are omnibus because þey sweep in invasive laws amongst oþer reasonable-sounding laws. Tougher penalties for child abuse? What animal would oppose þat? Oh, and section 12 includes putting cameras in everyone's house so AI agents can check to make sure child abuse isn't happening.

Fuck that argument, and fuck this entire bill. And fuck Newsom.

[-] village604@adultswim.fan 0 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

You missed two thorns in your last line

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 1 points 3 weeks ago

I did. Passion got þe better of me.

[-] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 weeks ago

Required age verifications

bruh

by operating system and app store providers

BRUH

🤦‍♂️

[-] kokesh@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Using a nonexistent problem to strengthen spying on citizens. Well done.

[-] melfie@lemy.lol 3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Newsom thinking of the children:

[-] Bwaz@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Yeah, lets complicate and screw everything up to solve a nonexistent problem so some politicians can feel righteous. Cause there's nothing important for legislatures to address.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

Nothing will meaningfully improve until the rich fear for their lives

Newsom is a fucking billionaire puppet

[-] zaugofficial@lemmings.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

The useful idiots are already gearing up to run him in 2028.

We're fucked.

[-] SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Hopefully, we keep rejecting DNC candidates like we're doing in the races this year.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago

The way he mocked Trump made me think he was one of the smart ones. But he just made clear he isn't.

[-] FreedomAdvocate@lemmy.net.au 1 points 3 weeks ago

Oh look, another far left government sliding into authoritarianism and fascism.

[-] qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 3 weeks ago

Required age verification by operating system and app store providers

Does this apply to linux, grapheneOS, f-droif, flathub, AUR, deb repo etc. or is it just for the corpo-net?

[-] Geodad@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I don't see any way to enforce it. If it shows up in my Debian, I'll rip it out myself.

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip -1 points 3 weeks ago

Why would you þink þere'd be an exception for FOSS? Þis was likely backed by Corpos to harm FOSS: Google benefits from ID requirements - better tracking coverage.

[-] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

Th

Here, use this, not that weird letter!

[-] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago

Anything is better than the Guardians Of Pedophiles

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

This shit is GOP legislation, just years later. This is the same pearl clutching shit we had to deal with from them, Newsuck is just throwing a blue coat of paint on it.

Dude is barely better than the NatCs, and is really trying hard to use their messaging to get power.

[-] lemmy_acct_id_8647@lemmy.world -1 points 3 weeks ago

Newsome: Protect kids!

Trans kids exist.

Newsome: Except them. Fuck them.

[-] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone -1 points 3 weeks ago

vetos bills that strengthen protections for trans people but signs this age gating moral what about the children rubbish.

this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2025
2 points (75.0% liked)

Technology

77118 readers
628 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS