Yeah. That's even more proof that kids shouldn't have them
GameBoy withdrawal symptom used to be a thing, too. We survived. They'll be fine.
Instant Dopamine Machines cause withdrawal when taken away.
Wow. I'm shocked, I tell you. Absolutely shocked and stunned.
I'd be more curious if restricting students to using screens as actual tools - i.e., for specific purposes and tasks, not for broad entertainment - causes similar effects.
I give absolutely zero fucks. Screens everywhere is the most developmentally impactful education policy I have seen in my lifetime. My local public school district (which my kids do not attend) has a 1:1 laptop policy, meaning each kid gets their own dedicated Chromebook. Under no circumstance will I send my children to schools that apparently think Google/Microsoft have the kids best interests at heart
Imagine the technological shift we could see if they were similarly powered linux laptops vs. Chromebooks. Get kids used to linux in school and I bet we'd start seeing Windows losing much more significant market share.
I can't imagine the shift would be much bigger than the kids just browsing tiktok/insta during class hours on chromium or firefox instead of chrome.
You could give them a Linux laptop and it would do all of the same things.
If people get withdrawal symptoms, it means they have become addicted. Which means it is important to get them off the addiction ASAP.
I really don't think the article makes a good case for why they are using "withdrawal symptoms" (which clearly evokes drugs) beyond being a nice quote. Could the behavioural issues be, say, kids figuring out what to do (or what they can get away with) now that what they used to do is no longer available? The article certainly doesn't say so.
The other thing is that these are things that are taking years to play out, which suggests to me that there may be more than just cellphones in the classroom. There is certainly a point to be made that if the smartphone is still used at home, you may up in a wash anyway. A reductive scenario I could think of, for example, might be that a student may say they are more attentive, and they may look more attentive, but if they aren't really engaging with because they will just go home and ask an LLM for the answers to the homework.
It seems like they are saying that having the phone taken away could be an even bigger distraction from learning than just having the phone.
I feel like this says important things about how much they should have been allowed screens before this.
"Stanford study finds school heroin bans may trigger "withdrawal symptoms" in students" is a headline that does not suggest that stopping students from using the heroin they are accustomed to, is the point at which the problem needs to be attacked.
Waiting for the "just a tool" crowd to emerge and complain that there's basically no difference between cell phones with chatGPT, vs a calculator or dictionary.
Technology
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.