163
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Nurse_Robot@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago

I want to say "no shit" but then I remembered that most people have no idea how safe nuclear reactors actually are

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 9 points 1 week ago

There's a huge anti-nuclear crowd, I'd prefer we focus on renewables as much as possible but it's stupid not to phase out oil/gas for nuclear as a more consistent source.

[-] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

There's a huge anti-nuclear crowd

Which was grass-rooted by oil companies back in the 70s.

load more comments (8 replies)
[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

I'm anti-nuclear, but it's because nuclear is so much slower to build and more expensive than solar or wind so the fossil fuel industry is pushing for nuclear to delay the transition away from fossil fuels and use up all the funding.

If you have nuclear plants, you've paid to build them and you're on the hook for decommissioning costs, sure, keep running them. Starting construction on new nuclear in 2026? That's a terrible idea.

You won't be up and running before 2040 and you're not going to be competitive against 2040's renewables and batteries, never mind 2070's.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

China is building them in 5-6 years, the best time to plant a tree was 30 years ago and the second best time is now.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

We can't build them in China, though. Only China can do that. My country doesn't even have an existing nuclear industry.

Sure we could start building reactors now, but we can get enough solar and battery storage through the night for less than nuclear would cost.

[-] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago

Props to China, but I know how long building projects take in my country. The plan will say 15 years and it will be done in 25 for 3x the price. And all that to have it produce a kWh for 0.50€. No, thanks.

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The 20+ year time to build is at best the direct result of lobbying and NIMBY and realistically just propoganda by antinuclear. The US mean for nuclear construction to production is 8 years. Japan has it down to under 5.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] YourAvgMortal@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Even if/when we replace fossil fuels with renewables, we still need a solution for surges, and nuclear would fit that very well

I thought nuclear was slow to ramp up and down and basically has to operate 24/7, providing a baseload. Batteries otoh are the quickest source to respond to surges from my understanding. Renewables+batteries are have been cheap enough for years that they're also good for baseload.

[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I live in a dry but mountainous area. I'd like to see them pump water uphill with any overpower so we can just use turbines to recapture that energy later. The average american keeps impressing me with their turnip-level intellect to the point where I don't want them running a carwash, much less a nuclear reactor. There are a lot of IRL Homer Simpsons out there.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[-] OldQWERTYbastard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 1 week ago

Well no shit. One of those things is actually useful.

[-] coalie@piefed.zip 18 points 1 week ago

Well nuclear power plants create something more useful than ai data centers, nuclear waste.

[-] call_me_xale@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Hell, some of the more modern designs barely produce that...

[-] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

I still remember learning that and about breeder reactors (they produce fissile material from common isotopes) and feeling so betrayed by the common zeitgeist

[-] Mountainaire@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

Indeed, nuclear is among the safest and cleanest forms of energy currently available to us! All the waste in the world for life barely fills a few football fields' worth of space, if I recall correctly.

[-] McTavern@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

One football field 10 meters high to be precise.

[-] zurohki@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

One football field 10 meters high

You're mixing US and metric measurement systems there. You should either stick to meters or come up with a sports analogy for the height.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] Vespair@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago

Masterful comment delivery, kudos

[-] Shadowklaw@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 week ago

Some groups have started to extract materials from nuclear waste that can provide Targeted Alpha Therapy for cancer patients, so very true.

[-] vaultdweller013@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Loads depleted uranium rounds with militaristic intent

[-] Steve@communick.news 2 points 1 week ago

Electricity too

[-] Rakonat@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Much of which can be used in hospitals for life saving medical uses! Double dunk on AI failures.

[-] mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago

Nuclear waste can be reprocessed and reused. France has been doing it for decades. Or you could reuse it in a thorium reactor, which needs less reprocessing.

Another thing people forget about is that nuclear power is the main source for tritium, which we have a shortage of and it's getting worse as more nuclear plants are decommissioned. Tritium has a lot of uses, but it's most noteworthy use is fuel for fusion power. If decommission all nuclear plants, fusion research is effectively dead in the water

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] tunetardis@piefed.ca 12 points 1 week ago

Nearly 50,000 residents of Lake Tahoe, a popular tourist destination in the Sierra Nevada Mountains, have been told their utility company will stop providing them with electricity in 2027. The utility, NV Energy, will instead use that power for data centers in northern Nevada, one of the fastest growing data center corridors in the nation and where Google, Microsoft and Apple have all either built or planned facilities, Fortune reported. Residents have until next May to find a new electric provider.

Wow, that's rather appalling. Ars has a longer write-up about it.

[-] MithranArkanere@lemmy.world 9 points 1 week ago

Generation IV power plants can be designed so that they are physically incapable of going into meltdown. And the technology is getting better and better at reusing the waste.

So, of course, one would prefer a nuclear power plant.

If anything, we really need to update old power plants and replace all other non-renewable plants with cleaner power, renewable or not.

[-] Rooster326@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Bruh I think most of the people answering this are imagining 3-Mile Island...

[-] WarmSoda@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's why they're saying modern plants aren't like that.

[-] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 7 points 1 week ago

With a nuclear plant, there’s a teeny teeny tiny chance I’ll get Hulk powers.

With AI, I’ll probably just lose my job and destroy the planet.

[-] Mearcfara@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 week ago

Tbh the statistics are pretty great for nuclear.

[-] Sixtyforce@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I like things that don't vibrate in such a way that it makes me want to vomit and die, true.

[-] mojofrododojo@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

gotta be careful here because they'll take that as consent for both. "GEE IF THE POWER IS ALREADY THERE...."

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 week ago

Why not both? \s

[-] devolution@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Unpopular opinion: wouldn't it be nice if the government wasn't against renewable energy? That way the data centers could use that instead of leech off of our supply.

Doesn't fix the issue with water though...

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] Denixen@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago

Since data centers will be run by nuclear power on-site in the future they will soon have both...

[-] Poem_for_your_sprog@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

No they won't. Natural gas turbines baybee.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

The joke of the Grok AI is how it's generating power in one of the least cost efficient manners possible.

Musk is just burning a ton of short term capital to avoid lobbying Mississippi (fucking Mississippi, the most easy state to bend over a rail with lobbyists in the country) for a hard-line to the existing grid and some upgrades to capacity funded on the public dime.

That's what you get to do as a trillionaire. Make stupid business decisions and then dump the turd onto your investors when they want to invest in your lucrative network of federal Pentagon contracts.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 14 May 2026
163 points (99.4% liked)

Technology

84941 readers
614 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS