138
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Weedian@hexbear.net 58 points 4 days ago

just because people may have "changed" doesn't mean they should be anywhere near a leadership position. I don't believe he has changed one bit but if he has why is he instantly running for senate and not volunteering at a soup kitchen or something like that

[-] Hexamerous@hexbear.net 31 points 4 days ago

Really takes white guy confidence and entitlement to think he should be running anything after that. It also takes a settler mindset to "see past" all that and voting for this guy.

[-] makeshift0546@lemmy.today 0 points 4 days ago

You had me until the end. Plenty of well meaning individuals would choose that path.

[-] TheBroodian@hexbear.net 41 points 4 days ago

As established, there's a lot of reason to doubt Platner is at all well meaning

[-] happybadger@hexbear.net 43 points 4 days ago

With the judgement of the people who chose the former path and nothing done to change that. You trust someone who has a Nazi skull on them? That means they're the baddy.

[-] kristina@hexbear.net 38 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Yeah so many well meaning Auschwitz guards with Nazi tattoos popuko-gun

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 5 points 4 days ago

So many well meaning israeli government supporters who are racist trash.

[-] quarrk@hexbear.net 1 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

It’s not about choice but entitlement. If he’s changed, why does he think he is the right person for office? If he is truly altruistic, then it should not matter that he wants or chooses this or the other path. He would do what is best for society.

White male leftists are supposed to figure out, through engagement with the masses (in particular those more marginalized, so basically anybody else), that nobody’s fucking asking what they have to say, or begging that they impose themselves. Sometimes you have to sit one out. You’ll survive.

[-] shath@hexbear.net 45 points 4 days ago

fucking abu ghraib are you fucking kidding me?

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 35 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Gtfo this guy was stationed at abu ghraib?

Dude what, everyone looks like a bigger and bigger clown for whitewashing him with esch passing day. What’s next with this guy?

[-] RedWizard@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

Progressives will tell you that he "was just a guard". Where have I heard that before?

[-] kleeon@hexbear.net 21 points 4 days ago

Ikr? This guy has to be a psyop

[-] la_tasalana_intissari_mata@hexbear.net 53 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

"but revolutions need veterans t-" I would put this person on the front lines to die and rot, not as a misleader you vote for in the most evil capitalist state in the world.

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 35 points 4 days ago

The revolution needs militants, militancy, people with military experience, yes, nobody said ‘ a warcrime enjoyer with a nazi tattoo’. I didn’t ask for this, nobody asked for this

[-] Dimmer06@hexbear.net 38 points 4 days ago

Nah he belongs in a prison for war criminals. A bloodthirsty guy like him is exactly who a revolutionary army does not want on the front lines because they're going to hurt working people who's support we need. Also his only experience in war is against poorly armed militias he could call airstrikes onto so I doubt he's really all that talented of a military man.

[-] Kefla@hexbear.net 20 points 4 days ago

Exactly. I mean of course if you're going to war, having people with war experience help you through common pitfalls is a benefit. I'd absolutely listen to Graham Platner's advice/leadership if I had a gun in my hand and a gang of fash mercenaries on the horizon. But in any other context he should shut the fuck up and/or die.

I'd absolutely listen to Graham Platner's advice/leadership if I had a gun in

Platner: okay so back in my days of combat in situation we would've called an airstrike on an orphanage near by

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 6 points 4 days ago

or used grenade launchers instead of the mortars we were forced to stop using out of civilian casualties concerns

[-] QinShiHuangsShlong@lemmy.ml 39 points 4 days ago

gang of fash mercenaries on the horizon.

I don't know if I'd be trusting the nazi tattoo guy in that specific instance. Maybe if it was a group of unarmed Muslim families it might be more in his area of expertise.

[-] OhioComrade@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 days ago

Real veteran revolutionary is Greg Levy running for Ohio Senate.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 29 points 4 days ago

Annnnd he's seeing someone about his bloodlust towards innocents, right?

Right?!

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago

The someones he's seeing about it: His DNC staffers

[-] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 19 points 4 days ago

I'm frankly a bit confused about what this guy's deal is.

Like is he trying to do Nazi entryism into left? If he is you'd think he'd do a better job covering up all the Nazi shit he did. Is he a CIA plant? Same issue as the last one, you'd think they'd pick a dude with a cleaner resume. Is his current stated progressive views genuine and he just had some kind of epiphany? If that's his story you'd think he'd run on that, "I used to be a violent CHUD but now I've seen the light!" but nah he downplays it. Does he not see any contradiction between his past actions and his current politics?

[-] bobs_guns@lemmygrad.ml 23 points 4 days ago

Maybe he's just a typical liberal opportunist who is a little more honest about his fascism than most.

[-] comrade_pibb@hexbear.net 13 points 4 days ago

This is my read. He's just a dumbass

[-] thelastaxolotl@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

My theory is that he used to be an actual nazi, but then turned into a lib but he was ashamed of his nazi past so instead of owning up to it, he keep making up lies like he was edgy or he didnt know he got a nazi tatoo in order to save face

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 14 points 4 days ago

I don't think he's ashamed of it because he would have gotten that death's head removed or covered long ago if he had even the slightest shame. He's genuinely the perfect DNC candidate, he's a liberal who is comfortable slipping into the fascist defense of capitalism when it suits him without any ideological change or shift needed.

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

He's genuinely the perfect DNC candidate

This really doesn't make sense when you account for his anti-Zionist rhetoric. Why would the DNC normalize a candidate who just yesterday during a NYT interview said AIPAC money is disqualifying and US aid to Israel should be cut off completely?

The DNC would not do that

[-] Juice@midwest.social 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Its just politics.

Susan Collins is a literal dragon, Platner has the best run on her. Keep in mind, the DNC varies in strength and organization. I think it shows Platner's campaign is willing to "play ball" in order to, however unlikely, make a good run at that senate seat. I'd say its more likely the DC consultant class that defines the national org (a class that is objectively on the back-foot, as the left is gaining nationally, albeit with mixed outcomes) thinks Platner is their best bet at an already extremely unlikely upset.

I think they have a read on him that would put him closer to Fetterman in the Senate. I think Platner is kind of dumb but upsetting Collins would be hilarious. And Platner has managed to get national attention, even pretty early on. I think he's just objectively the best odds in this race.

But I'm not to the point of even critically supporting him. I don't think he's earned a goddamn thing, being a highly problematic ex military pseudo anarchist or whatever doesnt make him qualified to lead our movements. But I think part of Platner's viability is because of a very weak bench in this race. Maine DNC clearly isn't creating or recruiting good leadership, which is a persistant problem in many political orgs.

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Because he will never follow through, he's an experiment in the new move of distancing from AIPAC while normalizing and taking funds from other Zionist orgs that are less notorious

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

It doesn't matter if he doesn't follow through; they would still be normalizing anti-Zionist politics and proving it's a winning campaign strategy. The DNC and its Israeli allies would never in a million years sign off on that, they don't want anti-Zionism to be normalized under any circumstance, let alone under the context of a Senate race

taking funds from other Zionist orgs that are less notorious

What are these orgs?

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

Then why are they backing him? Schumer endorsed. Regarding the Zionist PACs that operate as low key alternatives to AIPAC, I don't have a list on me but I can pull up some references when I'm back at my desk later.

[-] CyborgMarx@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

Then why are they backing him?

They're not backing him, he's winning by unprecedented margins, and their zionist pet Janat Mills ate shit and dropped out, so it's a mixture of damage control and not giving up the kayfabe and endorsing the Republican candidate. Remember, this is Maine; Schumer can't hide there behind media noise or silence like he can in other states; it's too small and white, the Democratic party in that state would implode. So he gave Platner a mealy-mouthed endorsement

Also as an irrelevant aside, Platner somehow did the impossible and transformed the r/Maine sub into an anti-Zionist hub, a US STATE SUBREDDIT, I literally said out loud, WTF? I mean if this is the DNC's plan, I say don't interrupt the enemy

[-] LeeeroooyJeeenkiiins@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

What if he wants healthcare and whatnot for himself and others but he just uh he just really likes killing people

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 4 days ago

He even wants to help others kill with the desire to increase navy ship building

[-] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

Oh is that something he's running on?

Shit that would actually explain a lot.

[-] Lussy@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

He is a CIA plant doing nazi entryism into the left

[-] ConcreteHalloween@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

To what end though? Like is there a particularly vibrant leftist movement in Maine nobody told me about?

Also seems like there'd be better candidates to do this than the guy with a straight up Nazi tattoo on his chest.

[-] muad_dibber@lemmygrad.ml 7 points 4 days ago

We need to start calling them the Abu Ghraib torture camp left.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 4 days ago

Again is this a critic of Maine if this is the best they can do to be a progressive or just the only one who said yes to running when asked.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 3 points 4 days ago

He is against funding for israel. That’s basically the only important issue this election cycle. Fuck the Israeli government and anyone who supports them in any capacity.

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 17 points 4 days ago

football-lucy

He'll be against funding for Israel right up until he gets elected. Just like he was opposed to wars and protested them right up until he joined the military so he could go do wars. And how he then protested the wars after he got out of the military, then signed up with Blackwater.

[-] Dort_Owl@hexbear.net 18 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Remember when Biden promised to erase student loan debt?

I wonder why leftists don't trust Democrats anymore

[-] john_brown@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

To be fair, Platner is an old school type democrat (willing to lie). Kamala and the rest of the longterm Dems have completely abandoned even that simple conceit, they just expect us to vote for them while they sneer at policies they would have felt compelled to pretend to support a scant eight years ago.

[-] goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 4 days ago

Partner and I would be done with ours if that had actually happened. Instead we just got them restarted under Biden!

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 4 days ago

We’ll see, I hope he’s not a fetterman but at least he is the one speaking the truth in his district at the moment as opposed to the status quo, which is the same.

[-] Pergoss@hexbear.net 3 points 4 days ago

It's annoying how many moralizing ultras are freaking out about this guy. Time will tell who's right on this because he's going to win the election.

[-] DancingBear@midwest.social 1 points 4 days ago

I hope so, he’s better than the alternative based on what he says

this post was submitted on 19 May 2026
138 points (97.3% liked)

Chapotraphouse

14372 readers
794 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Slop posts go in c/slop. Don't post low-hanging fruit here.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS