116
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by beep@piefed.world to c/technology@beehaw.org
top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 6 hours ago

IRC prank from the 2000s: if you type /quit playing games with my heart you'll hear a cool pop song.

2020s: if you type quit into Google it will understand this as an AI prompt.

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 1 points 6 hours ago

i dont understand why go through so many hoops just to use shitty search engine, is using google really worth that?

[-] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 6 hours ago

It just has more of the web in its index than competitors do, so there are good practical reasons on occasion.

[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 9 points 1 day ago

There's an extension called Disable AI that gets rid of those intrusive Google Search AI "replies". I strongly recommend people to use it, because… seriously, they are convincing but misleading trash.

The two phonemic transcriptions of "disregard" in the first picture are a prime example of that. I could go on a full rant about it, but to keep it short: compare them with the ones provided by Wiktionary, and play "spot the differences". (Bonus points if you also play "spot the undeclared assumptions".)

[-] samwise_gamgee@beehaw.org 6 points 23 hours ago
[-] lvxferre@mander.xyz 2 points 11 hours ago

You can also change it in the settings. Look for "search assist"; values are "never", "on demand", "sometimes", and "often".

But yeah, to be frank I use mostly DDG nowadays, I focused on Google due to the OP.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 4 points 22 hours ago

FYI when I tried Kagi's Quick Answer out of curiosity, even that gave me a dictionary definition for "disregard". That being the case, I'd trust it about as much as I trust Google's AI overviews (which is to mean "not at all"). It just doesn't show up for me unless I prompt it.

[-] XLE@piefed.social 4 points 22 hours ago

FWIW just searching Kagi (the way someone searched Google here) yields a dictionary definition "provided by WordsAPI". So it's actually

  • trustworthy
  • predictable
  • fast
  • energy-efficient

You can't say any of those things about AI.

[-] TehPers@beehaw.org 2 points 22 hours ago

Normally, yes. That always seems to be one of the results.

I specifically forced it to do a quick answer, and it still gave me a definition. Interestingly, for "disregard", it also covered a bit about the Google nonsense results after defining the word.

[-] Steve@startrek.website 8 points 1 day ago

Ublock origin -> block element

[-] Ludicrous0251@piefed.zip 12 points 1 day ago

Browser settings -> search engine -> literally anywhere else

[-] cronenthal@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago

Well of course, how else would a chatbot react? Do people really "use" this, intentionally?

[-] DdCno1@beehaw.org 5 points 1 day ago

Google claims they do. During their last presentation, they boasted about billions of users of their AI. The sheer gall of these people!

[-] lath@piefed.social 3 points 1 day ago

Yes, default users "use" this because it's helpful, until it's not.

[-] Klear@piefed.world 1 points 1 day ago

None of these are working for me, except maybe skip which just displays results without the AI box.

this post was submitted on 23 May 2026
116 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

42944 readers
171 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS