2
top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] dirtfindr@lemmy.ml 5 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago)

The fact that there is no mandatory phone reg. puts Session above Signal. But Session is still very dicey:

  • www.getsession.org is a CloudFlare site, which indicates that the staff on that project lack some basic knowledge about privacy - or they just don't care. (note that Signal also uses CloudFlare)
  • the developers have some kind of alt-right tendencies: https://chaos.social/@laufi/103825791713996438 The problem is not just ethical but conservatives inherently do not value privacy. They value money very much. This is a bad combination for a platform that wants to be privacy-centric.
  • they put a lot of energy into having a professional appearance. This is consistent with corporations with profit-driven intentions and atypical of charitible free software projects. Their org chart has everyone's photo (not characteristic of privacy advocates) and every single means of contact of every staff member is through Microsoft or Twitter.
  • website has links to privacy abusers (Facebook, MS Github, Twitter) and not a single link to any social networking service that self-respecting privacy proponents can use.
  • their email address traverses Google's servers and has no PGP key.
  • their project is managed on Microsoft Github.

BTW @AgreeableLandscape, itsfoss.com is not a good site to publicize; it's also jailed in CloudFlare walled garden (thus calling into question the extent to which that site genuinely respects freedom).

The only useful effect of Session is that it serves as a PR jab at Signal for requiring phones. And if it helps divide or shrink the Signal community that's a good thing.

[-] curiousgoo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Could you elaborate on your point of them using Cloudflare ?

My understanding is that their websites would be behind Cloudflare for their CDN and anti-DDoS services, maybe WAF as well. Solely looking at CDN services essentially the options come down to Cloudflare or Akamai who have a global domination of the market.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 4 points 1 year ago

The original commenter hasn't posted anything in 3 years so you're not going to get a response most likely.

Cloudflare due to its very nature has unique observation of internet activity. So putting your privacy focus system in front of cloudflare is giving them even more observability into your privacy system. So it seems antithetical.

[-] curiousgoo@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I didn't notice the 3 years part till I read in your comment.

Are there any privacy respecting CDN services though?

I won't comment on what Session is/was doing with Cloudflare services, but say if I am using DoT on my device for encrypted DNS requests, and the traffic is also E2E encrypted, how much can such a provider really see ?

Tools that we have at my job won't be effective if they receive an encrypted payload.

[-] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 1 year ago

It's honestly probably fine. Using cloud Flair for a website is pretty standard. I'm not sure if they use cloudflare for their oxen network but I doubt it.

I'm not familiar with any privacy respecting CDNs

[-] k_o_t@lemmy.ml 3 points 4 years ago* (last edited 4 years ago)

It really bothers me that not needing a phone number for registration is now a feature, and not a basic requirement for anything claiming to be anonymous/private...

this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2020
2 points (75.0% liked)

Privacy

32169 readers
521 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS