92
submitted 2 months ago by plinky@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net

linky

It is best to start with the simplest option. When 2026 rolls around, it would be easiest for Moscow and Washington to continue to abide by the limits of the expiring treaty. The two sides should also negotiate to resume on-site inspections — Vladimir Putin himself will have to be convinced that it is in Russia’s national security interest to do so. Perhaps the strengthening of the US nuclear industrial complex can be brought to his attention in a way that makes Russia’s interest in implementing the treaty abundantly clear.

As for the Chinese, if they reach 1,500 warheads by 2035 and continually refuse to talk then the US and its allies must consider a build-up.

The worst-case scenario is that Russia and China are hell-bent on increasing their nuclear holdings at the cost of global stability. If that occurs, the US will be ready and able to respond.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Dirt_Owl@hexbear.net 41 points 2 months ago

Hmm weird that a magazine called the Financial Times is giving the government advice on why it should build more nukes. thinking-about-it

Nevermind. Back to living in the innocent and free democracy that totally isn't a corrupt oligarchy dooming us all blob-no-thoughts

[-] FnordPrefect@hexbear.net 31 points 2 months ago

Manhattan Project Scientists: "And here we thought these weapons would make war unthinkable..."

Economists: "Oh it is! That's why we came to these conclusions without any thought whatsoever!"

[-] Pentacat@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago

We are now unfettered by thought!

[-] Infamousblt@hexbear.net 24 points 2 months ago

Literally destroying the entire world might not be as bad as you think, especially if it makes my stonk go up stonks-up

[-] kittin@hexbear.net 20 points 2 months ago

Lmao what’s the point of more nukes at this point? Destroy the world 6 times over instead of 5?

[-] FunkyStuff@hexbear.net 15 points 2 months ago

What it's always been, making the first strike more likely to achieve a certain amount of destruction when accounting for improvements in defence.

[-] Iwishiwasntthisway@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago

They plan on using it "tactically" which is to say in such a way to kill lots of people without causing as much fallout.

[-] WhatDoYouMeanPodcast@hexbear.net 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Those who don't learn from history are doomed to repeat it. Barking orders at Russia while they had nuclear arms was how the cold war started.

The only thing is, in round 2, I wouldn't put my money on amerikkka (nurses in trashbags country) over China. Personally, I would 开始学习汉字

[-] Hexamerous@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago
[-] vegeta1@hexbear.net 13 points 2 months ago

Moređź‘Źplanetđź‘Źrazingđź‘Źnukes

[-] vertexarray@hexbear.net 11 points 2 months ago

Dickwaving diplomacy. Magical thinking

[-] MusicOwl@hexbear.net 8 points 2 months ago

We are a fucking death cult masquerading as a nation.

[-] Sulvor@hexbear.net 6 points 2 months ago

Won’t someone think of the poor ICBM manufacturers?

[-] newerAccountWhoDis@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

lol when has the US built it's last nuclear weapon? Is there even anyone left who knows how to do this?

[-] wombat@hexbear.net 5 points 2 months ago

stalin shouldn't have stopped at berlin

this post was submitted on 05 Sep 2024
92 points (96.9% liked)

news

23575 readers
421 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS