371
So the threat to people's pets was not in fact Haitians but republicans themselves? Amazing.
It’s always projection. Every single time you hear a repub talk about kids getting molested, you can automatically assume that they have done so countless times. If you hear them talk about ruining jobs or the economy, you can be confident that they’ve worked to do so themselves at great length. This is just another addition to the pile.
None of the sources say they asked him to provide additional details about an incident they found to be unsettling.
It appears this conservative was happy to recount the event in which he violently massacred a noisy dog, but his various academic audiences never wanted to hear too much about it.
Because, naturally, gruesome acts are unsettling - to put it mildly.
And this is the pious architect of the manifesto dictating how we should lead our lives.
I work nights and my neighbor got a pandemic puppy. When he returned to the office, that bunny was getting separation anxiety pretty hard. Barking his cute little head off.
I certainly understand the frustration.
In my case I left a note and brought the pupper in to nap with me, though. Snuggled right up and passed out.
These dog murdering assholes? Deserve getting the shovel rammed up their ass.
(They subsequently went to doggy day care…. Booo)
I hope the owner of the dog seeks bloody and brutal retribution, if someone did that to one of my dogs theyd have to be burried in mason jars.
Conservatives, they're shooting the dogs, cutting the whales, they're hitting, they're hitting the pets of the people that live there. And this is what's happening in our country, and it's a shame. 😔
Decapitating a whale is impressive. Not good impressive, but still I wouldn’t know where to start
Republicans love killing pets and claiming others are. Strange how they protest everything they like
More weird than strange if you ask me.
That fascist sure group is a really weird bunch!
Killing dogs is fine with them, but eating them is an affront to everything they pretend to hold dear
They should ask RFK jr what he thinks about dog eating.
What is it about the reactionary mind that makes dog murder not only not a shameful story that one might want to keep to oneself, but a story you actually want to tell others or even put in a book?
It shows that you're not shackled by empathy and are willing to "do what needs to be done."
Meaning hurt the right people.
I don't really get why it takes news like this for people to understand that all those involved with this political program can't be good people.
I mean Hitler was a dog lover. Does that make him a good person? I don't think so.
I mean Hitler was a dog lover.
He also carried a dog whip with him and would beat his dog with it. Wouldn't exactly call that a dog lover.
I mean.
Pro: liked dogs.
Pro: artist.
Con: kissing cousin.
Con: Holocaust.
Pro: Killed Hitler.
Obligatory /s
I think you went a bit far there..
Pro: kissing cousin
Signed, George Michael Bluth
Happy cake day
More pros than cons, it's conclusive Hitler was good.
/s
These people cannot stop killing dogs. What is going on?
Psychopaths, all of them. GOP = Grumpy old psychopaths.
Gustapo of Psychopaths
Fuck people who hurt animals in particular.
Now we know why Trump was all about pet safety!
So, all these people went to this assholes house and listened to him brag about killing a dog with a shovel and never thought to mention it to the police (even anonymously)? I would say that makes them ~~compliant~~ complicit, and no better than him.
Also amazing how these holier than thou people are just absolutely disgusting people once you know anything about them.
Edit - Spell check doing its thing.
I think you want complicit here rather than compliant.
lol yep .. curse you spell check!
I don't know how that person is still alive after killing someone's dog.
this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
371 points (98.4% liked)
politics
19144 readers
1852 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS