146
These companies are total bullshit.
"We're not taxis. We're rideshare matching."
"they're not employees. they're... independent contractors..."
Do you... remember taxis?
Yes, public transportation is awesome and I wish it didn't suck where I live. But publicly traded companies are legally obligated to look out for themselves. The problem is government, yo - that's what decides what corpos can't do according to what society feels is "right".
Considering I mentioned taxis... yes. I remember taxis.
But this goes a bit beyond corporations looking out for their interests. the whole "we're not taxis" thing was specifically to negate local ordinances that require licensing and provide extensive regulations of taxis services. Like, service inspections, insurance requirements. Background checks to make sure your employees aren't psychotic ax murderers.
as fucked as NY's medallion system is, it's actually stopping a host of problems that Uber failed to address. instead of complying with the rules... it argued (successfully,) that it was a ride-share matching service, and wasn't any different than a person paying another for a ride into town.
Later, in CA they argued (again, successfully, at least in part,) that it's employees weren't employees but actually independent contractors. Specifically to get around minimum wage rules.
and they're dumping in shitloads of money to stop public service specifically so as to maintain their stranglehold on the industry.
Government is also fucked up. but Uber and Lyft are a part of why goverment is fucked up. (after all, they're people too.... right...?)
What are problems that Uber fails to address, that a customer cares about? Twisting words / rules so they can make more money is something public corporations are required to do. They HAVE to maximize shareholder value. Laws set guardrails against that, driven by what society agrees is "right"
Already seeing signs for this everywhere.
We need stickers that say "ad paid for by Uber/Lyft instead of paying drivers and tax" to slap on these signs.
Sneak sneak little shits.
SFGate - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)
Information for SFGate:
MBFC: Left-Center - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: High - United States of America
Wikipedia about this source
Media Bias Fact Check | bot supportSearch topics on Ground.News
https://www.sfgate.com/tech/article/uber-lyft-proposition-l-transit-19797995.php
this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2024
146 points (99.3% liked)
politics
19120 readers
2044 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS