1
submitted 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/videos@lemmy.world
1
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
1
1
submitted 5 days ago by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/videos@lemmy.world
1
submitted 6 days ago by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/videos@lemmy.world
1
submitted 6 days ago by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/videos@lemmy.world
1
submitted 1 week ago by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/videos@lemmy.world
[-] MrSmiley@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 week ago

While the connection may not ultimately matter scientifically, it matters ideologically. This modern day Lysenkoism emerging in America is a common feature of totalitarianism, and it will permeate throughout all sciences.

Incredible as some of these aberrations may appear, we must yet be on our guard not to dismiss them as mere accidental by-products which have nothing to do with the essential character of a planned or totalitarian system. They are not. They are a direct result of that same desire to see everything directed by a “unitary conception of the whole,” of the need to uphold at all costs the views in the service of which people are asked to make constant sacrifices, and of the general idea that the knowledge and beliefs of the people are an instrument to be used for a single purpose. Once science has to serve, not truth, but the interests of a class, a community, or a state, the sole task of argument and discussion is to vindicate and to spread still further the beliefs by which the whole life of the community is directed. As the Nazi minister of justice has explained, the question which every new scientific theory must ask itself is: “Do I serve National Socialism for the greatest benefit of all?”

The word “truth” itself ceases to have its old meaning. It describes no longer something to be found, with the individual conscience as the sole arbiter of whether in any particular instance the evidence (or the standing of those proclaiming it) warrants a belief; it becomes something to be laid down by authority, something which has to be believed in the interest of the unity of the organized effort and which may have to be altered as the exigencies of this organized effort require it.

The Road to Serfdom, F. A. Hayek

[-] MrSmiley@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

The introduction may be confusing but it wasn’t advocating for eugenics, the movie intro can be viewed as dumb people raise their kids to be dumb, not that intelligence was passed down genetically. And you are correct, religion and power need uneducated people to maintain hegemony.

1
submitted 1 week ago by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/videos@lemmy.world
15
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/politicalmemes@lemmy.world
1
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/videos@lemmy.world
5
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/videos@lemmy.world
[-] MrSmiley@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

After repetitive exposure to this propaganda (repetition priming), the people were beginning to believe and stand up for what each respective government had been flashing before their eyes, without them even knowing it.

https://sites.psu.edu/psych256sp18003/2018/03/04/h/

The fact of being exposed to propaganda and misinformation, repeatedly and continuously, has a psychological affect over time.

The individual must not be allowed to recover, to collect himself, to remain untouched by propaganda during any relatively long period, for propaganda is not the touch of the magic wand. It is based on slow, constant impregnation. It creates convictions and compliance through imperceptible influences that are effective only by continuous repetition. It must create a complete environment for the individual, one from which he never emerges.

Propaganda, Jacques Ellul

[-] MrSmiley@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Republican rhetoric follows Le Bon’s The Crowd method: Affirmation, Repetition and Contagion.

First they espouse an idea or belief (ex. Radical Left are violent animals). The crowd accepts these statements as true, regardless of reality.

Then blast it on repeat through every medium so it becomes internalized in their minds.

Finally, the contagion phase, where the crowd is spurned to action, whether it is getting out to vote, storming the capital or going door to door murdering “The Enemy Within.”

It’s not difficult to see what the fascist intent is behind the extreme violent rhetoric.

[-] MrSmiley@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Gotta capture and warp the minds of the youth to transform them into obedient fascist dogs.

Only through concentration in a few hands of a large number of media can one attain a true orchestration, a continuity, and an application of scientific methods of influencing individuals. A state monopoly, or a private monopoly, is equally effective.

Propaganda, Jacques Ellul

1
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by MrSmiley@lemmy.zip to c/youshouldknow@lemmy.world

Chapter 2 of his 1991 book The Nature of Fascism provides the concise definition and describes structural weaknesses of fascist movements.

Edit:

Generic fascism consists of three elements:

  1. The core of the movement contains a palingenetic myth (death/rebirth). They see society as decadent and liberal, and on its way out. That by burning down the system, their mythical utopia will “rise from the ashes like a phoenix”.

  2. It is a populist movement with a charismatic leader who typically exerts a “top-down” populism where decisions of “the people” are made by the leader. The leader usually stresses a “meritocracy”, but ends up placing incompetent loyalists into positions of power.

  3. The movement’s ultranationalism goes “above” and “beyond” traditional and legal forms of politics. It rejects Enlightenment humanism and liberal institutions (things like rationality, logic, the rule of law)

Structural weaknesses of the palingenetic myth: The movement is prone to factionalization due to the vagueness of the utopian vision. It also cannot sustain itself without continually designating new enemies from within and without, because the utopian vision can never be realized, there must always be a new enemy hindering its success.

Structural weakness of populist ultranationalism: The movement cannot survive without its charismatic leader. No matter what, everyone grows old and dies, even dictators.

view more: next ›

MrSmiley

joined 2 weeks ago