No they should be open to litigation, so this social service can be immediately sued for its entire years budget. It's not coercive its pragmatic.
No one has any right to complain, this possibility is clearly outlined in the t&c's every person agreed to.
Shouldn't have handed out your defining essence to a corporation.
It's nearly all just using a whole library instead of the specific single function thats actually required, because few people are actually writing any code these days.
Whatever you say you fucking dumbass
‘Vandals in the White House’ no longer reliable allies of Australia, former defence force chief says
People still treating this all like news from another planet. I am pannicked.
RaptorBenn
joined 4 days ago
Who should be responsible for these people agreeing to a contract and then not wanting to honour the contracts terms?
If personal responsibilty is "a whacked out take" then I'll take that.