1
1

In a comment I've made a little bit ago, I mentioned that I was tasking myself to discover music that was played on an old radio program that I listened to from the 2000s. And it is looking to be a lot more prolonged and tedious than I had thought. I've been able to find a program that has done an amazing job at removing the host's voices to where, I can't tell where they start or stop talking, I get hints that there were points of voices being there, but it's non-existent.

I've tried before in the past to use Audacity, but being that all recordings were done in Mono and not Stereo, no matter what I tried, the voices would still remain. So now that hurdle is done with, the next task is to go through all 139 episodes and all episodes average 1 hour to 2 hours. That's a long time if you're doing radio or podcasting, it's a lot of talking to do. Then it's a matter of listening back and forth at one points certain songs begin and end, marking times to point them out with.

I might pick out some standout favorites, episodes that contained the most songs that I would have wanted the most from them. Then once all of that is figured, the next course of action is to clean up the sample audio, because most of these episodes were recorded in Mono so there's going to be a lot of distortion and muddiness.

Then once all of that is done, the next challenging task is, actually finding someone who'll be able to identify what is played. I don't know electronic/techno music too well, I'm not entirely familiar with artists outside Daft Punk, Celldweller, 3Teeth and Pendulum to name a few. The only thing that sortof helps narrow things down is that they were all played on DI.FM at the time, so it may or may not help.

From there, it's just hoping I find them out there online.

It's a big project, but I've listened to these episodes for 18 years now and what kept me coming back to them besides nostalgic purposes, was the music played in them that never got identified.

1

People crying about Nintendo Online pricing. First off, it's for an entire year, not by monthly, so I don't know how that's a negative. That's just an example.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 7 points 4 days ago

No, so stop being freaked out for christ sake.

You and people like you, are making it sound like AI is capable of initiating Skynet-level of capability. At worst, AM-capability (I have no mouth and I must scream). That may be true in the beginning, but AI has been sharply nerfed to where it is just simply a talking search engine, calculator, number cruncher .etc that just so happens to also talk to you about other things.

So while you live in your worry caves, we're all over here being unimpressed with what art it spits out with extra limbs and inconsistency.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 10 points 5 days ago

So, I got site-wide banned from reddit a while ago due to using the word “purge” on a post

So, you're leaving out the details as to why you really got banned. It's not because of the word itself, you used it in a context you knowingly placed it in.

We don't need millions of users to thrive as a community.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 6 points 6 days ago

I'm going to rightfully assume you're asking this out of bad faith.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 1 points 6 days ago

I used to have moderated chat rooms and forums.

People didn't like me because I operated on a neutral, non-bias level of judgment. I also actually did shit like, banning/removing people who were problematic or fueling drama.

I guess we're still not ready for that kind of moderation yet.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 0 points 1 week ago

It's a class-based metaphor that judges how successful you are when compared to an idealistic version of someone who is successful by class. The Jones's are portrayed metaphorically as this rich, up-to-date, always on top of things, always getting things first and other things. If you don't meet those kind of qualifications, then you're not keeping up with the Jones's.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

If it already is, because it had already been decided. People once again misunderstand what exactly the 1st Amendment even covers. It protects you from the government silencing your voice and expression, which is what someone like Trump has been working hard to do.

It does not and should not protect you outside from that. You do not have a case on your hands when you're banned from an online forum for using hate speech. Because that forum, is not the government. Facebook, is not the government. Reddit, is not the government. So on and so forth.

9

Normally when this is asked, people think about reviving, curing, resurrecting. This question is about who you save if you were transported to a time a little before their death, like maybe a day before or even a week before. Anything about terminal illnesses or diseases contracted don't really count here because, when those things happen, they happen and there's really nothing you could do to have prevented it.

I think I would've wanted to prevent JFK's assassination. I'd tell him "dude, do not get in that limo and drive down Elm Street" and I'd show him a newspaper clip of the day of his assassination. I'd probably be looked at a little crazily and suspected of maybe being involved in something that pertains to that day. But, it's an effort I would've gone through to do that.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago

I think what always has plagued software engineering jobs is the office politics. The constant meetings. The ridiculous standards. The monotonous routines. The zig-zagging logistics of upper management. The dead-end dread feeling.

I don't even work software engineering, but it's just something I always heard about and kinda seen a bit of.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

IMDB has existed for a long, long time. It's honestly a shame as to what they turned into. They used to have been like the pinnacle of online movie reviewing and showcasing. Then they decided to axe the forums. Then they decided to blanket their splash page with what big movie is happening.

It just declined from there.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 0 points 1 week ago

I'm incredibly jaded about voting. I think these mid-terms and the next general election are elections of which I will not bother with. And it isn't even because of what's being done with voters rights or the intimidating corruption from the republicans/trump.

It is stemming more from me realizing that there has to be more done than just simply voting someone end. That there has to be more done with getting society straightened up more to be aware as to how badly they're getting fucked with. There just simply has to be more there to be done and I think voting isn't enough.

I've voted in past mid-terms and general elections, I felt I tried my part in being with those who tried to vote against and vote out corruption in anyway I can. But, I'm having difficulty in seeing how much voting can do in these chaotic times.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 2 points 1 week ago

At this rate, yeah.

I mean, that's how America was originally founded. We got sick of Imperial Britain's shit, fought them to get the fuck away from us. Then, when critical ideals came ahead about slavery, we had our civil war. We definitely need another, but the problem is, with how the world has changed.

Because, it'll be very bloody simply because one side will have all of the guns and ammunition (Government, police, military .etc) and the opposing side would only have numbers. In either case, it would send a very impactful and long-standing message about what happens when things are left unchecked for too long.

I don't think Democrats are that interested in fixing or helping things anymore, they have their own agendas, disguised in the form of progressive measures. They helped fund ICE earlier this year. They didn't fight hard enough to prevent any measures Trump and Republicans have taken that has undone what progress we have done.

So, if shedding blood has to be the answer to make anyone see or realize what really needs to be done, then that's what it is going to take.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 5 points 1 week ago

I hate it.

I think gambling has tainted sports and is the epitome of corruption to the core. It's very ironic that a baseball player by the name of Pete Rose, got a lifetime MLB ban for gambling, yet give it 20 some odd years later and Draft Kings is promoted which is gambling.

It fuels addiction, it makes people throw away anything they could that they could bet with, on the off chance, which is narrow, of winning it big.

It's why I hate Las Vegas entirely, I hated it when poker games were nationally broadcast for a while at one point and so on.

[-] Soulifix@piefed.world 1 points 1 week ago

Yes. Because, there's a friend who I know we'd mesh well together.

view more: next ›

Soulifix

joined 1 week ago