Please refrain from harassing our users, keep whatever argument you have contained to the thread it started. Following and harassing users across communities/instances is not tolerated.
You will only be given a temporary ban of one week from our instance, but if it continues after that it will changed to a permanent ban.
Please refrain from using slurs and disparage people for no good reason on our instance.
Photoshop (if it does?) and any other believable face swap apps use some sort of neural networks, which is exactly the problematic tech we are talking about.
That honestly makes me curious, what issues have you encountered when upgrading your python(3) version?
All it took for me to switch to GitLab was a larger free lfs quota which I wanted for a project. The superior webpage UI made me migrate every old project to it too.
Tabs work fine, you aren't allowed to mix, indentation must be consistent.
Clean code would have indentation though, and you can use whatever space you want as indentation. Bonus points if you use tabs so that others with special needs can configure the tab length on their end.
And I don't think I've encountered an indentation error since the day I learned the language. How often do you encounter that error when writing python scripts? Sounds more like a theoretical problem than something anyone used to python would encounter.
Guido once said on a podcast that if they ever ended up doing python4, removing the GIL might be one of the reason for that move. He wanted to avoid the issues we got with python2 - > 3 though. I wouldn't worry too much.
Normal users can see it?
I've never seen anyone being smug about their distro, but I've also never seen a comment where somebody have said they use Ubuntu. Arch on the other hand is everywhere, meme or no meme.
4 years since the last update on my phone, I really don't see why I would change unless core apps like Firefox were to stop working.
Looking at your instance handle, I hope/assume that your comment is supposed to be in lighthearted jest. However that would only be an assumption on my part and in general it's not ok to say someone's job/work tool is for [remarks directed at sex, gender, ethnicity, orientation, disabilities, etc...] per CoC 3.5.
Please take into consideration that members on this instance may be of different backgrounds than what you're used to and interpets what you say differently. Further breaches of our Code of Conduct may lead to temporary or permament ban.