While I'm a strong proponent of reducing and possibly eliminating car use, this image is disingenuous. They neatly packed 69 (nice) people into a medium bus, sure. But when showing cars, it's almost 1 persons per car (I counted 15 cars in a row and there are 4 rows, so 60 cars). You can definitely use cars more efficiently than that.
Assuming that actually autonomous self-driving cars exist, they could be extremely efficient. Especially if you treat them like ride sharing taxis. In other words, a lot of people could share the same car and that would reduce the amount of owned cars. They also never waste space being parked. So I can see how when we make a real self-driving car, it can potentially reduce traffic. Especially for all those cases where public transportation doesn't work.
And what the heck is a "connected car"?
This meme is a paradox. It's is and also isn't a placebo. Schrodinger's meme?
And the organizations from the post must have their evidence for making their claims. Otherwise they wouldn't be considered reputable.
But that doesn't matter, because you still misused the fallacy.
When I was reading that line I could already feel the Hexbear comments coming.
Wasn't disappointed.
– You can't scare me with this Nazgul crap. I know my rights. I want my 2nd breakfast.
They don't, actually. Most of AI stuff is processed on device, few go to their private infrastructure, and only certain Siri requests go to ChatGPT, if you give explicit permission.
In Minecraft, right?
And the number of Communists in the room stayed the same.
As someone who knows Cyrillic, it always takes me minutes to figure out what the text is actually trying to say. Like "try it hot", in this case.
Or just shape it into a cylinder.
Noot Noot!