The link for uBlue didn't work for me. For those interested: uBlue
the best os-design there is: the unix-like system.
Couple of questions:
- Is there even any scientific basis to this statement?
- If yes, would you be so kind to cite sources as I got trouble finding peer-reviewed articles on the matter.
- If not, would you be able to make a logically sound argument on why that is the case?
- Why Unix-like and not Unix? Wouldn't Unix be the actual "original vision"?
Regarding 4; I suppose you're looking for the ArcMenu extension if you wish to continue using GNOME as your Desktop Environment (will be abbreviated to DE from here on). Though GNOME's workflow is considerably different to Windows'. Therefore, you might be interested into looking elsewhere unless you're actually interested to continue GNOME. FWIW, GNOME is one of the most popular and most polished DEs out there, but it's very opinionated; which rub some folk the wrong way. I personally like it, but others might differ on this. Lastly, GNOME is NOT particularly known to be light. Therefore, if you're not happy with how it runs; e.g. frame skips with animations or just high RAM usage overall, then perhaps consider Xfce or Lxqt. If you're not discontent about the performance on GNOME, then you could also consider KDE or Cinnamon as those might 'feel' more 'modern' than the aforementioned Xfce and Lxqt.
Regarding 5; Ubuntu gets a lot of hate due to:
- how they're forcing Snaps (their in-house universal package manager; therefore a direct competitor to Flatpak) onto its users. So much so that even attempting to install some packages through
apt
will result in the Snap being installed instead; which is basically unprecedented within the Linux landscape. - some mishaps in the past resulted in very bad PR; especially to those that are privacy-conscious and/or F(L)OSS-advocates.
You'd have to get to your own conclusions though. It's probably still the most used distro and therefore you might expect some QoL-features are only found within. If you're inconclusive, just try it out and consider reporting back to us on how it went. Regarding old hardware; the DE is the most important factor anyways.
You may be happy, or perhaps dismayed, to learn that I finally installed Bazzite on my desktop.
Well played! Welcome to the cool kids club! I've actually used Bazzite myself for a short while a couple of months ago. It felt like a holiday destination with lots of cool stuff, but it was more opinionated than what I'm comfortable with. So I returned back home (read: custom uBlue image) afterwards, where I am in command for what's found inside and where I am free to do whatever I will. Though, I did pick up some of the things I liked from Bazzite 😜, so it was not for naught 😉.
I did a bit tonne of sampling, with BlendOS and Vanilla, trying things out, but Fedora wins.
Very interesting! I've got my own reasons for preferring Fedora *cough* ~security~ *cough*, but I'm very interested to know your findings! I'd have to admit that Vanilla OS' upcoming 2.0 Orchid update is very tempting though.
I have Fedora Silverblue on a usb in case Bazzite does not like my computer,
Hmm..., perhaps consider the following:
- Rebase back to Silverblue with
rpm-ostree rebase fedora:fedora/39/x86_64/silverblue
(assuming you're already on Fedora 39). - After you've booted into Silverblue, pin the Silverblue-deployment with
sudo ostree admin pin 0
. - While still in the Silverblue-deployment, rollback to Bazzite with
rpm-ostree rollback
. - Reboot, and you should notice that you have one additional entry in the GRUB-menu. That's the Silverblue-deployment where you can always fall back on; just in case*.
The above steps do assume that you haven't pinned any prior Silverblue-deployments; as you don't necessarily need multiple Silverblue-deployments 😅. Furthermore, they assume no additional steps involving Nvidia; but that's mostly because I don't have any experience dealing with that (thankfully).
I swear I will just jump onto the NIXOS (or guix) bandwagon if I ever decide to switch again.
FWIW, you can install both Nix and Guix on Silverblue.
Manjaro’s advertising as compatible with mainline AUR
I've honestly never used Manjaro nor do I ever intend to, however this page suggests otherwise. Would you be so kind to point me out where I can find said advertising?
Yup, it's absolutely lovely. Did you experiment with a custom home directory for your distrobox yet?
From a comment of yours;
Eh…just trying to learn some new things regarding common “dockerization”-related things, and improving its security.
If the end-goal is not learning but having an as secure container as possible, then consider Wolfi; this is a good read. If you're interested to know its current vulnerabilities, so that you can work on resolving those; then consider Trivy as it is -to my knowledge- the industry-standard for this specific use-case.
Additionally, ensure that flatpaks are installed within that home partition. Some distros (like Fedora) default to installing flatpaks system-wide (and thus flatpaks end up being installed in /var
instead). So, after ensuring that your home folder is correctly found within the home partition, just install flatpaks with the flatpak install --user *package-name*
command.
No the NV41MZ for example has no numpad.
That's unfortunate.
but it was the only clevo on like all Europes Ebay. Literally shipped it in from Great Britain
Honestly, I haven't done a lot of business on Ebay. So, I don't know a lot on how much cheaper you might get devices from there. Though, I wonder if it's a lot cheaper than say this device.
I feel a bit lazy at the moment, but Brodie does IMO an excellent job at explaining what a package manager is within the context of Linux. I'd recommend you to watch that instead over here; it's already set to play at the correct time*.
On LibreWolf, which I use to surf daily, I got one in 180k+.
Afterwards, I tried Tor Browser -which is honestly almost never used- and this was a lot better at one in 6k+. Though this was only in "Safer" mode, I tried testing it on "Safest" afterwards, but an update screwed it up and I somehow couldn't get it back to its standard opening size.
Interestingly, my best result I got once again on LibreWolf. This time, I changed two things:
- Enable letterboxing
- Disable Javascript entirely through uBlock Origin
This resulted in a one in 800+. I am interested to know how Mullvad browser users fare on Mullvad VPN.
This wouldn't sit well with most privacy conscious folk out there. Though, I can understand it from a security point of view. Especially, when one notices that Chromium isn't installed from Fedora's repos, but instead the RPM is built to offer a more up-to-date version that should provide improved security compared to the stable version.
Probs for the sake of disabling unprivileged user namespaces; as you might have correctly alluded to.
I imagine for the sake of minimizing attack surface.
The Nix package manager is installable on Fedora's atomic distros, so perhaps that route is worth exploring.
To my knowledge, Flatpak's sandbox indeed isn't achievable by default with RPMs; unless one knows how to properly utilize SELinux to that effect.