So, how’d you come to the conclusion that the us isn’t to blame for opium production during its occupation of Afghanistan?
because there are zero facts to support it.
you argument is fundamentally flawed. no matter how many ways you twist yourself up, twist my words, or twist anything else, you’re never going to successfully argue against the facts.
you lost this argument hours ago. you’re just torturing yourself at this point.
at least you have the decency to be ashamed of your pitiful remark btw. shape up
seeing things that aren’t there isn’t healthy, dude. consult a physician. although I am supposed you know what “shame” is. should we call that growth?
very mature dude
says the guy who’s been throwing a little-by tantrum for the past couple of hours.
“you beat your wife hehehe”
of all the things I actually did say, you just can’t control yourself and the compulsive lying… fascinating.
how many keyboards have you broken today? this week? this month? game controllers? computer mice? how smashed-up is your phone?
I’d ask about physically abusing spouses, but hehehe… who would ever get near a toxic rage monster like you? at least others are probably safe!
What conclusion do these facts support?
that you will draw biased conclusions and assert them free of any factual evidence to back them up.
oh, so when you get caught in a lie, you just hurl insults rather than admit to it. hardly a surprise…
that sounds like a personal problem for you
if you had presented any evidence, it might have, but you didn't
my advice: let it go
I’m not responsible for your lack of evidence. now you even admit you don’t have evidence to back up your claims, and you accuse ME of bad faith?
lmao
if that funding were guaranteed and beyond the influence of those government officials, then they wouldn’t have any fear of revenge-based budget cuts.
this could be accomplished by putting control of the funding into the hands of multiple levels of committee oversight so that no one person or even a single committee could threaten it.
lol