[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 38 points 1 week ago

A truly horrifying prospect.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 weeks ago

Well, I can understand the feeling, but it's not true. Many of the states in between have a better ratio of relatively sensible people to fruitcakes than it looks like, but the fruitcakes have gerrymandered voting districts pretty severely. Which is a self reinforcing issue.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 month ago

USA had the same thing, "Cash for Clunkers". Some of the cars we were better off getting rid of. Some of them not, whether because they were rare or classic, or old but still more fuel efficient than a truck or SUV. Sure increased the average price of a used car though.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Of course. Those resources are just a much larger impact percentage wise on an appliance replaced every two years vs 25.

[-] jmill@lemmy.zip 27 points 1 month ago

More water and energy efficient to run, yes. If you have to replace them every couple of years the resources used to make new ones need to be included too though, and that will have a big impact on the comparison. That said, I have had a modern front load pair for at least 5 years now, no issues.

jmill

joined 1 month ago