[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

The difference is that women used to not have to work outside of the home. So you can divide that 60 hours in half. When men got home everything was done and ready.

Currently both the man and woman have to work and earn income just to maintain the bills and expenses for a family, then there is all the house chores. So effectively the modern work week is more like 80 hours.

This was done by the bankers that duped women into the fraud known as feminism, which convinced them that relying on your husband was a bad thing. Now women are forced to earn just to exist, effectively doubling the money stolen in the form of the fraud known as "income tax".

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 5 months ago

Good info. Anyone with significant amount of hashrate should only be solo mining or using p2pool. The centralized pool operators could be skimming 5% and you would never really be able to know.

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 6 months ago

It has improved lately since they released a new version a couple weeks ago.

I think monero.fail removed the I2P nodes from the list because they timed out during the height of the dos.

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 7 months ago

Not being in the UN is a badge of honor IMO.

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 7 months ago

War is good for bankers. They fund both sides to destroy themselves then fund the reconstruction with loans and make a killing all day.

Anyone imposing "sanctions" is the real criminal and aggressor.

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 8 months ago

BTC maximalism is a cancer in the crypto ecosystem. Despite BTC being crippled and barely usable they refuse to enable superior and functional alternatives. It is the same mentality as those that control fiat systems.

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 8 months ago

It is the swap providers doing that not trocador. Avoid using Bitcoin as it has the highest scrutiny, do small amounts, and look at their rating for each provider.

They now have an AML risk checker which can help you avoid having your coins held hostage.

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 8 months ago

Thanks for the info. I am sure a check could be put in place to determine if the syncing wallet is local or remote and compression enabled accordingly. If not a manual option can be put in place where the user can specify if they want compression enabled.

As blocks continue to grow due to increasing TX counts this feature will become a huge benefit.

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 8 months ago

I see what you are saying. Once we have the usability and feature set of matrix with a blockchain based decentralized solution I am 100% in. ๐Ÿ‘

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 8 months ago

First thing I thought of as well. Using Monero everyday I am starting to think of value in Monero ๐Ÿ˜

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

Yes, and they would not even need to move it to a new wallet, they can just send the balance to themselves in their existing wallet and it would be sitting in the latest block. Ready for another 10 years of storage.

This difficult but vital decision should have definitely been made right from the start, as it is blatantly obvious they we cannot store all data forever. Then as tech improved it could be adjusted to 20 years in the future.

[-] tusker@monero.town 2 points 8 months ago

People can use Monero how ever they wish, but rules should be in place to prevent their use from negatively affecting the network.

If we have a giant spam attack and someone adds 100GB to the chain in a week there should be a mechanism in place to drop this data eventually.

Since there is no way to determine good data from "bad" we have to just drop all data that is aged.

view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ

tusker

joined 1 year ago