False dichotomy. Doesn’t have to be one or the other. It can be “more” under one party than with another.
How is it that SO MANY people literally can’t see past a false dichotomy logical fallacy? I swear every other fucking comment is like “Yuhh WELL it wouhda been the same under the LIBS” like some sort of “gotcha”.
The amount of people that desperately need a course in basic informal logic is beyond astounding.
No no no, it’s “socioeconomic” profiling. Completely different I promise 😉
Beautiful day; enjoy! 🙂
Tbf, I have no idea whether coast guard would actually be liable. However, one of the coast guards’ responsibilities is rescue, so I would think if they willingly and intentionally ignored someone in obvious danger (this is very obviously dangerous), they would need to take some responsibility for anything going wrong? And I can’t blame them for not wanting to take the risk?
Even if the man sent a clear “no distress” signal, they have no idea if the man is having a mental crisis, or what other circumstances are. Even if they did know all the background information and know for 100% this dude is not in distress (again, he is in danger…I think we can all agree on that?), would you want to be the guy that made the call not to rescue him, then find out he died because of that?
I say rescue him so he doesn’t die of idiocy, and then fine him for the rescue efforts to deter future behavior?
The administration has actually done quite a bit in the background surprisingly. You do need to dig for it though
Yeah no kidding. The very definition of reckless negligence, jesus christ.
Eh. It’s 1 day a year. Yeah kinda stupid but it’s not like it’s every week or something.
Anyway, have your upvote.
Taking screenshot of this
WHY DO YOU REDEEM
Linus cures head wounds?
Especially with that makeshift antenna hanging 💀
Oh for fucks sake