Of course I read it, and investigated the source. The issue is with the title the article chose.
The title is 'internet', implying a network of networks. The title wasn't 'new record in data transmission speed'.
The actual source: www.nict.go.jp
Not really an 'internet' world speed record, but really a wired data transmission record if I'm reading correctly.
Could've honked while being overtaken
6 million customers?
How many could there be that aren't affected? We only have 27 million people total right now.
Have to say, the steamdeck has been great for this.
Pick up exactly where you left off, press the sleep button to pause exactly where you are. I tend to play on story mode now because I don't have time to grind and just want to experience the game.
Sits beside the bed so once the kids have been put to bed and if there's down time it's pick up and go.
I love how they went into so much detail about why the old numbers would be accurate, then proceed to say they can 'safely' say that windows has lost 400 million users over a sentence on a blog stating windows has 'over a billion users'.
No source for the blog post. Here it is: windows blog
Note that the number has been updated, and at the bottom they state that that figure has been updated.
The original text said 'over a billion'. 1.4 billion is over a billion.
youngalfred
joined 1 month ago
Windows+L