25
submitted 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/technology@lemmy.ml
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] onlinepersona@programming.dev 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)
[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago

that's the dream

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 7 points 2 weeks ago

And then the American government helps to speed up the process by banning Intel to selling CPUs to Huawei and affiliates

The reason China is forcing themselves to use shitty, slow, and inefficient processors is because they're indirectly injecting billions in the industry in this way, because no consumer would ever buy a zhaoxin CPU, which is slower than a celeron while more expensive than a core i7.

So, government using shitty processors = after a decade those shitty processors should improve to parity.

Now, if also consumers are forced to use the shitty processors, then the industry has even more incentive to improve

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 weeks ago
[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 2 weeks ago

No, it's this, they mostly want x86 for government use https://www.tomshardware.com/news/loongson-launches-3a6000-cpu-matches-14600k-ipc

An article that lists the CPU: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/cpus/china-bans-intel-and-amd-cpus-for-government-offices-and-servers-plans-to-switch-to-domestic-made-alternatives

That Huawei CPU is mostly marketing as doing 5nm chips with duv machines is possible but yields much less because it needs more steps. It's also the same design of 4 years ago

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Loongson makes sense for government use because it can act as a drop in replacement for x86, but it's pretty clear the chips SMIC is making for Huawei are what's going to the consumer market. These chips are only a generation behind the bleeding edge.

You're right that yields might be low currently, but all that means is that it's just less efficient to produce chips, and it's not like the problem is insurmountable. Meanwhile, silicon as a substrate is hitting limits now, there's nowhere to go past 2mn because you start having problems like quantum tunnelling effects. So, it's not like western chips can keep improving indefinitely without radically new designs.

[-] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

government using shitty processors = after a decade those shitty processors should improve to parity.

Strangely this reminds me of when China pegged its currency to the dollar.

[-] waspentalive@lemmy.one 1 points 2 weeks ago

So Chinese chip makers sell more and more of the sub-parity chips, what incentive do they really have to improve?

[-] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 1 points 1 week ago

Patriotism + unlimited funding = innovation

[-] nullPointer@programming.dev 4 points 2 weeks ago
[-] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 4 points 2 weeks ago

They copied and pasted text that had a link in it, and got the alt-text.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 17 May 2024
25 points (80.5% liked)

Technology

33326 readers
187 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS