88
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] z2k_@lemmy.nz 21 points 1 year ago
[-] lemmy@linkopath.com 102 points 1 year ago

From the transcript and ai generated summary from Claude:

Here is a summary of the key points from the Linus Tech Tips YouTube video on why DisplayPort is better than HDMI:

  • DisplayPort has an embedded mode (EDP) used in laptops and tablets to drive internal displays in a simpler, thinner way vs HDMI.

  • DisplayPort has a USB-C alt mode to deliver signals over USB-C ports, enabling charging and video over one cable. HDMI's alt mode was discontinued.

  • DisplayPort is royalty-free while HDMI charges device makers a per-unit royalty fee.

  • DisplayPort supports multi-stream transport for daisy chaining multiple monitors from one output.

  • DisplayPort can easily convert to HDMI signals via passive adapters, but not the reverse.

  • DisplayPort cables often have latches to lock them in place, preventing accidental disconnections.

  • Key advantages of DisplayPort are higher bandwidth, more flexibility, lower costs, and convenience features over HDMI. But HDMI remains widely used due to broader consumer electronics adoption.

In summary, the video makes the case that DisplayPort is technically superior to HDMI in several ways, though market dominance of HDMI persists. Both serve an important role in connectivity.

[-] quicksand@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

Do you know why we generally don't use DisplayPort instead of HDMI? I'm always interested in how lesser technologies proliferate.

[-] Zeroxxx@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago

HDMI came around four years earlier than Display Port, so one of the reasons is that it has been around longer, therefore allowed mass adoption, first mover advantage.

[-] quicksand@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Ahh makes sense. Seems like USB A vs C a little bit. Except C is so much better I get to deal with both lol

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago

In that case, USB A came out right 20(?) years earlier than C - I'm guessing here, don't slay me.

There were USB patches for windows 95 to add the support in

[-] duncesplayed@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

USB A came out right 20(?) years earlier than C - I’m guessing here, don’t slay me.

Pretty close. It's debatable at exactly what moment a cable "comes out" (is it when the specification is finalized? When it's published? When device manufacturing starts? When a popular consumer device first has it?) but my personal opinion is 1996 and 2017 for USB-A and USB-C, so 21 years difference.

[-] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

And here I was concerned about exaggerating...

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
this post was submitted on 14 Aug 2023
88 points (73.9% liked)

Technology

34821 readers
20 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS