Diplomats and experts in Seoul warned that war in Ukraine is reshaping the global security landscape and raising new risks for the Korean Peninsula, as military ties deepen between Russia and North Korea, at a panel discussion Friday.

They suggested that without closer cooperation between European and Asian democracies such as South Korea, responding to security threats will become increasingly difficult.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has evolved into a broader geopolitical confrontation, with North Korea supplying weapons and manpower to Russia, while China provides economic and diplomatic backing and Iran contributes drone technology.

These alignments, according to diplomats and experts from Ukraine, the EU and Germany, are accelerating the erosion of international norms.

...

Panelists warned that negotiations could be used by Russia as a tactic to gain time rather than reach a real peace agreement.

"This war is not only about Ukraine, but about whether international law still matters," highlighted Andrii Vieshkin, charge d’affaires at the Ukraine Embassy in Seoul, reiterating Ukraine’s resilience over more than four years.

Vieshkin stressed that while Russia has failed to achieve its strategic objectives, the war remains "brutal, costly and deeply destabilizing," with continued attacks on Ukrainian cities.

He also cautioned that failure to hold aggression accountable could set dangerous precedents globally, including in the Indo-Pacific.

...

"Security in Europe is closely linked to the Indo-Pacific," he said, reaffirming the bloc’s push for a "just and lasting peace," Ugo Astuto, EU ambassador to Korea, underscored in his remarks echoing interconnected regional security.

...

Web Archive link

...

China is carefully analyzing the war in Ukraine, weighing the risks before a possible scenario around Taiwan. At the same time, Taiwan itself is actively preparing for defense, adopting Ukrainian experience and building up military capabilities, says Andriy Kramarov, a reserve officer of the Ukrainian Air Force and military expert.

...

According to Kramarov, China already had "ideal moments" for an attack, but did not use them. This once again confirms Beijing's caution.

"China understands that this is not just a war with Taiwan. This is immediately a conflict with the US, Japan, and South Korea. And that's a completely different level."

...

According to the expert, Taiwan is actively adopting Ukraine's war experience. Moreover, cooperation is bilateral ... "They [Taiwan], in fact, in exchange for their technologies - also receive our developments. In particular, marine drones and other solutions," the Ukrainian military expert explains.

...

Web Archive link

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/49348920

...

China is carefully analyzing the war in Ukraine, weighing the risks before a possible scenario around Taiwan. At the same time, Taiwan itself is actively preparing for defense, adopting Ukrainian experience and building up military capabilities, says Andriy Kramarov, a reserve officer of the Ukrainian Air Force and military expert.

...

According to Kramarov, China already had "ideal moments" for an attack, but did not use them. This once again confirms Beijing's caution.

"China understands that this is not just a war with Taiwan. This is immediately a conflict with the US, Japan, and South Korea. And that's a completely different level."

...

According to the expert, Taiwan is actively adopting Ukraine's war experience. Moreover, cooperation is bilateral ... "They [Taiwan], in fact, in exchange for their technologies - also receive our developments. In particular, marine drones and other solutions," the Ukrainian military expert explains.

...

Web Archive link

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/dataisbeautiful by /u/Borg_King on 2026-03-23 06:26:21+00:00.

This is an automated archive made by the Lemmit Bot.

The original was posted on /r/dataisbeautiful by /u/davideownzall on 2026-03-23 05:46:50+00:00.

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/49349611

Diplomats and experts in Seoul warned that war in Ukraine is reshaping the global security landscape and raising new risks for the Korean Peninsula, as military ties deepen between Russia and North Korea, at a panel discussion Friday.

They suggested that without closer cooperation between European and Asian democracies such as South Korea, responding to security threats will become increasingly difficult.

Russia's invasion of Ukraine has evolved into a broader geopolitical confrontation, with North Korea supplying weapons and manpower to Russia, while China provides economic and diplomatic backing and Iran contributes drone technology.

These alignments, according to diplomats and experts from Ukraine, the EU and Germany, are accelerating the erosion of international norms.

...

Panelists warned that negotiations could be used by Russia as a tactic to gain time rather than reach a real peace agreement.

"This war is not only about Ukraine, but about whether international law still matters," highlighted Andrii Vieshkin, charge d’affaires at the Ukraine Embassy in Seoul, reiterating Ukraine’s resilience over more than four years.

Vieshkin stressed that while Russia has failed to achieve its strategic objectives, the war remains "brutal, costly and deeply destabilizing," with continued attacks on Ukrainian cities.

He also cautioned that failure to hold aggression accountable could set dangerous precedents globally, including in the Indo-Pacific.

...

"Security in Europe is closely linked to the Indo-Pacific," he said, reaffirming the bloc’s push for a "just and lasting peace," Ugo Astuto, EU ambassador to Korea, underscored in his remarks echoing interconnected regional security.

...

Web Archive link

Comments

[...]

OpenClaw [AI] simultaneously addresses two massive psychological needs in China today: for the employed, it’s a perceived “cure” for overwork; for the unemployed, it’s a new opportunity outside of the usual delivery and ride-hailing grind.

[...]

cross-posted from: https://mander.xyz/post/49348810

...

Forcing Ukraine to relinquish the Donbas would dismantle its defensive shield, which together with the army, broader society considers an internal security guarantee. Rather than de-escalate the conflict, it would provide Russia with fortified ground, logistics hubs and forward operating depth, enabling it to regroup and prepare further offensives from a dramatically stronger position. A Russia that gains territory through coercion will use any pause not to reconcile, but to rearm.

It also violates a core principle of international law: borders cannot be changed by force. If conquest succeeds in Ukraine, other revisionist powers will conclude that war pays. Framing the Donbas as a bargaining chip also ignores the lived experience of Russian occupation. It treats territory as a bargaining chip while ignoring the people who live there.

...

Millions of Ukrainians live under Russian occupation across parts of Kherson, Zaporizhzhia, Kharkiv, Sumy and Dnipropetrovsk, along with the areas of the Donbas and Crimea. Their experience of Russian rule offers a clear indication of what further territorial concessions would entail.

Human rights organisations have documented widespread abuses in Ukraine’s temporarily occupied territories, including mass repression, forced deportations, filtration camps, torture, disappearances and the systematic eradication of Ukrainian language and culture. The Kremlin is implementing a comprehensive campaign to erase Ukrainian statehood and identity – an ethnic cleansing in plain sight.

Russia’s coercive ‘passportisation’ policies deny access to employment, mortgages, home ownership, school enrollment and healthcare – including to critical medicine and other basic services – to anyone not holding Russian papers. Residents are also forcibly conscripted into the occupying Russian military, which is a war crime.

Education systems now impose the Russian curriculum, while Ukrainian language instruction has been banned. Tens of thousands of children have been deported to Russia or subjected to so-called ‘re-education’ programmes, including via ‘summer’ or ‘holiday’ camps. Disinformation is widespread on Telegram and other social media communities, which have become powerful tools to foster loyalty to Russia.

...

Territorial concessions do not bring lasting peace. They create temporary, unstable ceasefire lines which Russia transforms into militarised enclaves to exploit in future escalation.

There is also a question of democratic legitimacy. Ukrainians have endured extraordinary hardship since the start of the war, yet public opinion repeatedly shows strong resistance to trading land for so-called peace. This reflects a widely shared understanding that surrendering territory under military pressure would reward aggression and leave Ukraine permanently vulnerable. Pressuring Ukraine to hand over land undermines its sovereignty and agency.

Wars do not end simply because one side seeks peace. They end when aggression fails. Peace without justice and security is an illusion. When Russia’s annexation of Crimea and invasion of Eastern Ukraine in 2014 was rewarded with limited consequences – it returned stronger. Rewarding further territory would only embolden an even more dangerous aggressor.

...

Web Archive link

I just recently started using a solar charger to charge a 10k mah battery pack that I use to charge my phone every night. One device “off the grid.”

Short of installing solar on my home I’d really love to be able to charge a large battery that would output 120V so I could use household appliances “off the grid.”

Does anybody have some other energy hacks, or ways to reduce your energy consumption at home that’s not just “use less energy?”

Archived version

• Western governments are systematically embedding critical minerals supply chain security into legislation, sovereign financing, and bilateral trade frameworks, creating a structural, not cyclical, repricing of ex-China mineral assets.
• China's dominance across rare earth processing (91%), nickel supply chains, graphite (75% of global processing), and cobalt refining (78%) represents a concentrated vulnerability that geopolitical friction is now forcing Western economies to address at speed.
• Policy-driven supply discipline, from Indonesia's 2026 RKAB quota cut to the DRC's cobalt export controls and China's rare earth export restrictions, is shifting commodity pricing from demand-pull dynamics to state-managed corridors, fundamentally altering how mining projects should be valued.
• The investment filter has narrowed: first-quartile all-in sustaining cost (AISC), processing route differentiation, permitting visibility, and jurisdictional alignment with Minerals Security Partnership countries now determine which development-stage projects attract institutional capital.
• Late-2026 Final Investment Decisions (FIDs) and construction starts across nickel, rare earths, graphite, and rutile represent the primary valuation inflection points investors should be tracking now.

...

Western governments are actively reshaping critical minerals markets through policy, financing, and supply controls, turning them from cyclical commodities into strategic assets. China’s dominance in processing, not just mining, has exposed a structural bottleneck that Western economies are now racing to address, creating a premium for ex-China, traceable supply.

As a result, only a narrow group of projects, those with low costs, integrated or partnered processing, strong permitting visibility, and alignment with Western jurisdictions, are attracting capital. Key assets like Crawford, Kabanga, and Kasiya, alongside infrastructure like Energy Fuels’ White Mesa Mill, sit at the center of this shift, with late-2026 Final Investment Decisions representing major valuation catalysts. The core takeaway: this is not a typical commodity cycle, but a policy-driven repricing where execution, integration, and geopolitics determine winners.

...

Artist: Shapoco | fediverse | bluesky | pixiv | twitter | danbooru

Full quality: .png 1 MB (2048 × 2048)