https://archive.ph/WrJw9

This article does not seek a “better” method. Instead, it argues that the law often mistakes sanitization for progress. Modern execution methods do not resolve the issue of cruelty. They only manage its appearance.

As societies experiment with new forms of executing people, the deeper constitutional problem is not only that an execution method may inflict severe pain. It is that the law’s comparative framework can treat cleaner presentation as improvement even when the State has merely repackaged terror, bodily distress, and coercive violence in more technical form.

Source (Bluesky)

• Piefed chat
• Fediverse wiki
• Guide and tutorial

!communitypromo@lemmy.ca • !newcommunities@lemmy.world • !fedigrow@lemmy.zip • !newcomers@piefed.zip

Hi ! I hope you are well ! Here is our weekly thread 😎

The fediverse is big ! Let's share our small gold nugget found in the fediverse. :)

It could be :

• A new peertube channel
• An interesting mastodon account to follow
• Your new community ! Yes ! Why not ?
• An cool gallery of picture from pixelfed
• A playlist from funkwhale
• A text that moved you

Let's dig together ! 😁

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/44422759

Comments

Comments

Comments

A judge ruled in December that the agency could not cancel a program that had helped states invest billions of dollars in disaster readiness

The New York Times now requires about 1/10 of people clicking a gift link like this one to register in order to access the article. You can either:

• Register — you don't need to pay — but you do need to give up an email address
• Open the gift link in a private browsing window
• Use archive.is to skip the paywall entirely, but sometimes modifies archived pages, and generally fails to archive complex multimedia content.