2417
It’s true (i.imgur.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Digester@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Piracy is the only viable option. The problem isn't the concept of a streaming subscription service, the problem is how many of them there are. A couple would be fine I guess but if we consider the fact that all the content is divided in more than 10 major services, it's no longer a viable option.

[-] AlexisFR@jlai.lu 4 points 1 year ago

Do you really want everything centralized to a single actor, though? If Netflix had complete monopoly, that would have been catastrophic.

[-] Digester@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not what I'm saying. Take cable tv subscriptions for example. Multiple companies offer different subscription tiers at different prices but you can get the highest tier subscription which includes all the channels.

Now imagine having to subscribe individually to each Channel, this is essentially what these streaming services are doing.

load more comments (3 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
2417 points (98.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

54746 readers
240 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS