72
What problems does Linux have to overcome to get more users (programming.dev)
submitted 4 months ago by cm0002@programming.dev to c/linux@programming.dev
97 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Games on Linux are great now this is why I fully moved to Linux. Is the the work place Pc's market improving.

OQB @RavenofDespair@lemmy.ml

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] Brosplosion@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 months ago

Needs brainless application management.

Windows is basically: download the installer, run it, and boom you're good to go.

Linux distros typically have 2-3 different ways to install applications and multiple mechanisms for updating/maintaining, where most of the good ones are non graphical. It's confusing for even experienced users let alone someone who doesn't know what a "package" is.

Say I want to uninstall something, I need to know how it was installed (apt? Snap? Flatpak? Manual build from source?) in order to do so. On windows, they have a registration scheme where installers log to a common OS level application management on what to run to uninstall.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org 10 points 4 months ago

Linux distros typically have 2-3 different ways to install applications and multiple mechanisms for updating/maintaining,

Windows ways to install applications:

  • hunt down an installer either exe or msi file, or a zip which you unextract somewhere which doesn't then create desktop icons and then scattered all aroundu
  • Windows store, just like any other application store by MacOS or Linux only shit
  • Winget, cli installer just like under Linux but actually decent
  • chocolatey, aaaah just stop!

On windows, they have a registration scheme where installers log to a common OS level application management on what to run to uninstall.

Yup sounds absolute reasonable... Wtf?

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 5 points 4 months ago

Right but in practice nobody really uses the Windows store, and winget, chocolatey etc. are only used by geeks. For normal users it's always

  1. Download .exe or .msi
  2. Double click it.
  3. Follow the instructions.

On Linux you have:

  1. apt, dnf, etc. - pretty reliable but only really work from the command line (I have yet to use a "friendly" store frontend that actually works well), and you almost always get an outdated version of the software.
  2. Snap or Flatpak - the idea is there, but again I have yet to actually use one of these successfully. They always have issues with GUI styling (e.g. icons not working), or permissions, or integration or something.
  3. Compiling from source - no Windows software requires this but it's not uncommon on Linux.

Also it's relatively common for Linux software not to bundle its dependencies. I work for a company that makes commercial Linux software and they bundle Python (yes it's bad), but that depends on libffi and they don't bundle that. So it only works on distros that happen to have the specific ABI version of libffi that it requires. And you have to install it yourself. This is obviously dumb but it's the sort of thing you have to deal with on Linux that is simply never an issue on Windows or Mac.

[-] nyan@lemmy.cafe 5 points 4 months ago

Dependencies only become an issue if you don't distribute your source (allowing distros or individuals to compile against the shared libraries they actually have installed, and patch out minor compatibility issues). Since closed-source is frowned upon in the Linux world, it's unsurprising that there are various sorts of pressure to Not Do That.

[-] FizzyOrange@programming.dev 3 points 4 months ago

Since closed-source is frowned upon in the Linux world

Indeed, this is a root cause of the problem. But it is a problem. The Linux community needs to get off its high horse and make distribution of binary programs (which may or may not be open source) work properly.

Snap and Flatpak are definitely a step in the right direction at least.

[-] DmMacniel@feddit.org -3 points 4 months ago

Right but in practice nobody really uses the Windows store, and winget, chocolatey etc. are only used by geeks.

ok.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
72 points (86.7% liked)

Linux

10848 readers
560 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Ategon@programming.dev
anzo@programming.dev
dwraf_of_ignorance@programming.dev