482
New Rule Forbids GNOME Shell Extensions Made Using AI Generated Code
(www.phoronix.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
482 points (99.0% liked)
Linux
10710 readers
271 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Why would that be anyone other than the original author? This sounds like a hosting service is refusing to host things based on what tool was used in creation. "Anyone using emacs can't upload code to GitHub anymore" seems equivalently valid.
in the case of ai generated code, that is almost always the case. People say "but I review all my pet neural network's code!" but they don't. If they did, the job would actuallydtake longer. Reading and understanding code takes longer than writing it.
I don't think this is in response to my message. If that was the intent, I think you need to define what "that" is, which is always the case.
"why would that be anyone but the original author?"
That is what i was replying to, and I replied to the intended comment
So we agree, it's almost always the case that the original author is the one fixing the code?
no, the opposite. The problem with ai pull requests is that in most cases whoever submits them does not understand the code and expects someone else to review it for them (that's if they are even aware of the concept of code reviews in the first place).
Who said pull requests? That isn't the topic of this thread.
Over and over again y'all ai haters seem to want to apply some bad experience you had at work to this completely different scenario. It's not the same.