135
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
135 points (97.9% liked)
Linux
10937 readers
672 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Groff is indeed such a crap format to write documentation in. It nearly reads like zalgo.
I can't wait for the anti markdown people to come out of the woodwork though and complain that it's "the progressivist agenda" to be more user friendly because devs aren't users.
"If you can't write Groff, maybe you dont deserve to read the output"
"The markdown evangelists are so annoying. You can't just rewrite everything in markdown"
"When will this markdown craze stop??? I can't hear it anymore!"
Identity politics entered the developer arena.
Missing features in Markdown:
I'm not saying not to use md (vs. asciidoc/tor, restex or orgmode) but to add the features please.
Description lists?
Richtext? Like this or this ?
SVG handling? I've never seen a manpage with SVGs nor have I seen a manpage with images, much less image captions.
That's not rich text. Rich text is when a format is applied without structural reason.
You could have a markdown interpreter that displayed
**this***this*or_this_using any arbitrary format. You could change the color, weight, border, drop shadow, opacity, mouse over effects, font face... Any attribute.Lemmy has conventions but all
*really means is emphasis.