136
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 30 Dec 2025
136 points (97.9% liked)
Linux
13347 readers
249 users here now
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)
Also, check out:
Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Groff is indeed such a crap format to write documentation in. It nearly reads like zalgo.
I can't wait for the anti markdown people to come out of the woodwork though and complain that it's "the progressivist agenda" to be more user friendly because devs aren't users.
"If you can't write Groff, maybe you dont deserve to read the output"
"The markdown evangelists are so annoying. You can't just rewrite everything in markdown"
"When will this markdown craze stop??? I can't hear it anymore!"
Identity politics entered the developer arena.
My personal bias is being pro markdown. I do not know groff so below is based on some inferences on my part.
But I don't think markdown is suitable for man pages, which contain specific kinds of information structured in a prescribed way. Markdown doesn't and can't know about these.
As I understand it, because of using a more sophisticated structure than MD, its possible to do things like: