UK lawsuit against Valve given the go-ahead, Steam owner facing up to £656 million in damages (www.gamingonlinux.com)

submitted 18 hours ago by ZippyBot@lemmy.zip to c/gaming@lemmy.zip

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 13 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

Imposing Platform Parity Obligations (“PPOs”), that prohibit publishers from selling Products through other distribution channels on better terms than the same Products are available on Steam. The PCR alleges that the PPOs are likely to cause, and have in fact caused, restrictions of competition.

Not sure I'm understanding this but... how do you explain when we find in official retailers such as fanatical or humble same games at lower prices?

Imposing anti-steering provisions to the effect that, if a publisher wants consumers playing its Games distributed on Steam to be able to make in-game purchases, all such purchases must be made using the Steam application programming interface, and therefore Valve’s payment processing service. As a result, the payments are subject to Valve’s commission charges. Such anti-steering provisions leverage Valve’s dominant position in the Game Markets so as to enable it to secure a larger share of the Add-on Content Markets, by preventing or restricting the ability of other distribution channels to supply (including self-supply) Add-on Content for Games distributed on Steam.

This is also something I don't get. I think games like FFXIV which has an online store lets you buy directly from their store (outside steam) their items, if that's the case, how does this part stand its grounds?

Imposing excessive commission charges which amount to an unfair price which is then passed on to consumers.

This I get, but couldn't valve simply say: "Go to epic store if you want lower fees"?

[-] nous@programming.dev 4 points 15 hours ago

Not sure I'm understanding this but... how do you explain when we find in official retailers such as fanatical or humble same games at lower prices?

At least for humble store, they essentially sell steam keys. Which at least complicates that argument. So it is not really a different distribution channel and the product is available on steam for that price. Just not on the Steam store.

This I get, but couldn't valve simply say: "Go to epic store if you want lower fees"?

Steam have an effective monopoly here. Even if they have that because all the other platforms are shit. So the argument for just going to another store doesn't really help as that just causes a massive loss in the market share of who you can sell your game to. Plus if you consider the other requirements of if you sell on steam you cannot make your game cheaper via a different distribution method means that you have to eat that feeling and cannot pass it on to customers. Which does not give game Devs much power to negotiate for a lower fee at all.

[-] AbsolutelyNotAVelociraptor@sh.itjust.works 2 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

At least for humble store, they essentially sell steam keys. Which at least complicates that argument. So it is not really a different distribution channel and the product is available on steam for that price. Just not on the Steam store.

I get this but, for what I know (I might be wrong tho), steam doesn't get a cut from keys sold externally so they are technically selling them at better conditions elsewhere?

Steam have an effective monopoly here. Even if they have that because all the other platforms are shit. So the argument for just going to another store doesn't really help as that just causes a massive loss in the market share of who you can sell your game to. Plus if you consider the other requirements of if you sell on steam you cannot make your game cheaper via a different distribution method means that you have to eat that feeling and cannot pass it on to customers. Which does not give game Devs much power to negotiate for a lower fee at all.

I know that but that's not really steam's fault? I mean, epic offers lower fees, but they are shit so nobody wants to buy from them; however, that's not really steam's fault. You can't blame steam beacuse the competitors are objectively worse.

EA tried to have a launcher, but they are so bad at it that they've come back to steam. That's... EA's fault for sucking so bad, not steam fault for being more convenient.

And I say this fully understanding that they have a de-facto monopoly; but the reason is not because they have the only product, it's because the rest are much wose.

[-] nous@programming.dev 1 points 8 hours ago

I get this but, for what I know (I might be wrong tho), steam doesn’t get a cut from keys sold externally so they are technically selling them at better conditions elsewhere?

It is a grey area. But I think the key point is that humble bundle at least don't distribute the games in the same way as epic does. They typically offer steam keys which they get from steam probably with a different license or agreement with steam. Valve seems to not care that much about how the game is sold as long as you can activate it on steam. It cares more about people buying games on a competing platform cheaper then they can get a steam key for.

I know that but that’s not really steam’s fault?

Whos fault it is is irrelevant. If you have effective monopolistic power you are effectively a monopoly. If you abuse that power then that is bad. Does not really matter if you got there because you mostly do things people like or bully your way there. If you abuse the power that is still bad. And they could arguably be abusing that power against game devs by setting a fixed 30% fee with the devs not having much if any power to argue for less.

load more comments (1 replies)

this post was submitted on 27 Jan 2026

16 points (80.8% liked)

Gaming

4313 readers

246 users here now

The Lemmy.zip Gaming Community

For news, discussions and memes!

Community Rules

This community follows the Lemmy.zip Instance rules, with the inclusion of the following rule:

No NSFW content

You can see Lemmy.zip's rules by going to our Code of Conduct.

What to Expect in Our Code of Conduct:

Respectful Communication: We strive for positive, constructive dialogue and encourage all members to engage with one another in a courteous and understanding manner.
Inclusivity: Embracing diversity is at the core of our community. We welcome members from all walks of life and expect interactions to be conducted without discrimination.
Privacy: Your privacy is paramount. Please respect the privacy of others just as you expect yours to be treated. Personal information should never be shared without consent.
Integrity: We believe in the integrity of speech and action. As such, honesty is expected, and deceptive practices are strictly prohibited.
Collaboration: Whether you're here to learn, teach, or simply engage in discussion, collaboration is key. Support your fellow members and contribute positively to shared learning and growth.

If you enjoy reading legal stuff, you can check it all out at legal.lemmy.zip.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Demigodrick@lemmy.zip

Sami@lemmy.zip