328
OOP at home: (feddit.nu)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] grendel84@tiny.tilde.website 10 points 4 days ago

@tiramichu
It's this mentality that shows you aren't mediocre. Simplicity requires more skill, not less.
@mesamunefire

[-] jason@discuss.online 2 points 4 days ago

Yup. They made it to the other side of the bell curve meme. Most developers have an OOP phase until they learn that it's utter bullshit.

[-] grendel84@tiny.tilde.website 2 points 3 days ago

@jason

I do like being able to easily bundle properties and functions together. I think objects are useful if kept in their simplest form.

Though I think some would argue that not using inheritance and interfaces and such precludes it from really counting as OOP

[-] jason@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I can definitely respect a limited approach. I personally don't find any benefit from it. Anecdotally, I've become much more productive since switching from OOP style C++, to just straight C. I think a lot of that comes from the boilerplate and ceremony required to make it do the thing, but in C, you just do the thing.

I also think even using objects tends to encourage poorer design choices by thinking in terms of individual items (and their lifetimes) which is enforced by the constructor/destructor model. As opposed to thinking in terms of groups of items which leads to simpler and safer code.

load more comments (1 replies)
this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
328 points (95.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

29742 readers
907 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS