668
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ZomieChicken@sh.itjust.works 26 points 2 days ago

Or do as Alan Kay wants and start calling it "Message-Oriented Programming".

"I'm sorry that I long ago coined the term "objects" for this topic because it gets many people to focus on the lesser idea. The big idea is "messaging"."

https://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/1998-October/017019.html

[-] presoak@lazysoci.al 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I skimmed that.

So you've got a bunch of message transceivers (aka objects). And the magic is in the message soup.

Yes?

[-] ZomieChicken@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

From my understanding, yes. Personally, I've seen so many different definitions of "OOP" (most of which were incoherent), I developed my own definition of what an 'object' is, and just go on with life.

load more comments (4 replies)
this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
668 points (97.7% liked)

Programmer Humor

29880 readers
98 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS