118
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2026
118 points (96.8% liked)
Gaming
27808 readers
211 users here now
Sub for any gaming related content!
Rules:
- 1: No spam or advertising. This basically means no linking to your own content on blogs, YouTube, Twitch, etc.
- 2: No bigotry or gatekeeping. This should be obvious, but neither of those things will be tolerated. This goes for linked content too; if the site has some heavy "anti-woke" energy, you probably shouldn't be posting it here.
- 3: No untagged game spoilers. If the game was recently released or not released at all yet, use the Spoiler tag (the little ⚠️ button) in the body text, and avoid typing spoilers in the title. It should also be avoided to openly talk about major story spoilers, even in old games.
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
https://legalnewsfeed.com/2026/02/17/seattle-jury-rules-against-prominent-patent-holder-in-landmark-anti-trolling-case/
Edit: searched Valve Rothschild lawsuit
This is transparently LLM-generated.
"This decision could encourage more legal reforms and influence the strategies employed by law firms and corporations in handling patent disputes. As the legal community and the tech industry continue to navigate these challenges, the ruling in favor of Valve provides a noteworthy reference point in the evolving discourse on patent law."
That's 161 words straight of unadulterated "oh fuck, the deadline is in ten minutes and I haven't reached the word count."
Welcome to life today. Less time than you take to discredit this can copy/paste the search terms yourself and choose, but no, you're taking the extra time for disparaging OP and sources. Looks pretty defensive and makes me wonder about your investment.
For context, I usually come across accounts posting something on social media without a source. Then I use a search engine to search some keywords from that claim (in this case Valve Rotschild lawsuit) and if multiple sources report on it then I select whatever headline looks appealing and contains decent looking information. I barely do any background checking on the websites so it's possible I receive LLM websites. If the other user just told me "this LLM website is bad" I wouldn't change anything but they also provided a good alternative to easily change the post to another article so I don't mind.
That's fair. After a loooong short shift, I missed that part. My b, we're human.