389
submitted 4 days ago by Deceptichum@quokk.au to c/mop@quokk.au
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago

A community can collectively decide on rules, and collectively decide how to enforce those rules. If someone is harming the community and will not stop when asked, the community can decide to forcibly eject that person from the community.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 4 points 4 days ago

So, yes, I (with enough backing of the community) do get to tell hypothetical-you that you can't shit in the drinking water.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 5 points 4 days ago

Yes. The difference between our current system and Anarchism is that it is much, much harder to create a system that does not benefit the everyone, since the people who are usually negatively effected by the whims of corporations or centralized power would now have the ability to directly have a say in how their local community decides on rules and how to enforce them.

There would also be no wealthy elites who can influence things, as there would be no mechanism or ability for an individual to accumulate vast resources or wealth.

[-] jtrek@startrek.website 3 points 4 days ago

Sounds reasonable as you've written it. I do worry about people's over willingness to bend the knee, especially when they're frightened or angry. It seems like someone with a strong personality could convince people to go along with stuff that benefits him more than them. But, no system is immune to bad actors and idiots.

[-] ProdigalFrog@slrpnk.net 3 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

But, no system is immune to bad actors and idiots.

Agreed. Though I think it would be particularly difficult for a strongman or strong personality to take hold in an Anarchist society.

If it was successfully implemented, and everyone is now receiving free housing, food, healthcare, public transport, and education all in exchange for 2 to 3 months of voluntary work (the rest being free time), I think it would be exceptionally difficult to convince that populace that actually they should actually go back to the old way where they work for him all year in exchange for some paper that would then give you access to those things which you already have for free.

I just think it would be almost impossible to put that genie back in the bottle, just as it would've been almost impossible for medieval kings and lords to bring back serfdom after mercantilism/capitalism was established.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
389 points (99.7% liked)

Memes of Production

1271 readers
1232 users here now

Seize the Memes of Production

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the “ML” influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Rules:
Be a decent person.
No racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, zionism/nazism, and so on.

Other Great Communities:

founded 2 months ago
MODERATORS