You are so full of shit dude 😂

Let's argue about the content of my argument and not resort to personal bad faith attacks on eachother.

It has to be accepted as legitimate by the most of the population for it to be considered a slur guy not just the people getting offended (hard for you to imagine a small group doesn't get to define legitimacy of words and ideas I can tell)

So any word that has a 51% of the population say its not a slur is thus not a slur to use? I don't think you are aware of how this would turn out.

Sometimes a group is right in the complaint about use of a word BEFORE its legitimized as a slur by the greater population, but yeah that's not how any of that works

So this paragraph exists to negate ur previous paragraph when I inevitably point out that many words u belive to be slurs don't meet the criteria u outlines as slurs. But u can claim that its still a legitimate slur cos its offending a special snowflate "protected group".

Its complicated but as for the reductive or objective reasoning on a complex social issue you did, ya done failed bad.

Usually an explanation as to why accompanies radical claims line this.

And I don't usually do this but you used the worst fucking one, it's "There" bro

But u did it anyways didn't you. Just couldn't resist being a grammar Nazi hey?

Most basic man alive today does analysis, keep trying but you got some learning still to do

Again have some class and engage my ideas instead of be a condescending insufferable asshole.